Sizing Up The Competition: The Weigh-In

SilverStone's Mighty Milo

At the end of the day I feel I prefer the looks of SilverStone’s Mighty Milo build. I appreciate a more conservative down to business look with my hardware. Ultimately though beauty is more than skin deep. Inside this machine has a few tricks that will help it hit against the opponent.


Mighty Milo & SilverStone's Tony Ou

Much of the hardware will be covered in the final fight when we benchmark each machine, but even just superficially we can see that this machine has the potential to keep quieter with an absence of case fans being installed on the machine coupled with large openings to aid passive airflow.  The aftermarket CPU cooler should also perform better than the stock Intel cooler, allowing either higher overclocks or lower noise at the same temperatures. All of this in a low profile case that with the included handle installed can be easily moved from home to school and easily placed in many locations, though care may need to be taken to allow room for the case to breath with the absence of case fans.

While building in the ML08 I got to experience my first SilverStone case. The common thread I always see in SilverStone case reviews was that SilverStone cases take a little bit of extra work but leave you with good results. After the involved process was completed we are left with what I think is a good example of a compact and elegant machine, with room for much more potent hardware in the future should anyone want to upgrade it further.

Crucial's Ballistix Bantam


Ballistix Bantam & Crucial's Jeremy Mortenson

For Crucial's Ballistix Bantam build I honestly didn't look forward to building in a Thermaltake case in the same way I did the ML08 from SilverStone’s build. Though when I got down into building inside this case it felt more relaxed than I expected. The build process was a lot more straightforward and having little things like places that are out of sight made cable management much easier. When all the panels are off I was essentially building a computer in a cube frame and had very few instances where space was an issue despite this being a mini-ITX build.

I did have to work a bit but while I feel this case isn't as good looking on the outside I also think that I managed to put together a machine that looks much better on the inside. Along with the better cable management the addition of thumbscrews on the case panels means I expect this case to be much friendlier to tinkering in the future with the extra space and means to keep cabling out of the way helping ease any work that happens inside this computer. Alongside the build experience we have a beefier CPU and larger SSD that may lead to a more balanced experience, and an external DVD drive will allow optical media to both be used with this machine and any other computers the end user spends time with.

Performance results for both of these builds are coming in as we speak, so be sure to keep an eye out in the coming days for the final battle between SilverStone’s Mighty Milo and Crucial's Ballistix Bantam.

How To Enter

For Build-A-Rig, we are posting the survey link on each piece so users can enter at any time. The final entry date is November 13th, as round 2 of the Build-A-Rig challenge is quickly coming to a close.

For the purposes of the giveaways, we should state that standard AnandTech rules apply. The full set of rules will be given in the survey link, but the overriding implementation is that the giveaways are limited to United States of America (US50), excluding Rhode Island, and winners must be 18 years or older.

With apologies to our many loyal readers outside the US, restricting the giveaways to the US is due to the fact that AnandTech (and more specifically our publisher, Purch) is a US registered company and competition law outside the US is very specific for each nation, with some requiring fees or legal implementations to be valid with various consequences if rules aren’t followed. It’s kind of difficult for the rules of 190+ countries/nations worldwide to all be followed, especially if certain ones demand fees for even offering a contest or tax on prizes. We recognize that other online magazines and companies do offer unrestricted worldwide competitions, but there are specific rules everyone should be following in order to stay on the side of the law. That’s the reality of it, and unfortunately we cannot change on this front, even with the help of Purch.

The survey link is: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/2382250/AnandTech-Newegg-Build-A-Rig-Challenge-Round-2-Sweepstakes

Building Crucial's Ballistix Bantam
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Samus - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    I'm wondering how you are going to install Windows 10 with the Pentium G3258. The bundled microcode update Microsoft pushed in June to Windows 7/8 is already built in to Windows 10, and this update borks Windows from booting on a Pentium G3258. You have to delete the microcode update DLL from the installation media just to get Windows 10 to install.
  • meacupla - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    this, apparently, only happens on overclocked G3258, and especially if it's not using a Z chipset.
  • Samus - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    It happened in a few B85 oem boards at the office. I even tested a chip in an HP Elitedesk 800 and same result.

    Overclocking and motherboard chipsets all have nothing to do with microcode. The flaw is in a register call to the second core. The ONLY was to run the microcode update is to disable the second core.
  • Daniel Williams - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Oops, I arguably should have mentioned the Windows install process. But getting the G3258 running isn't difficult, but does require a couple extra steps. But you have the right idea Samus, disable one core, delete or rename the microcode update DLL, and re-enable the second core. Then it's off to the races like nothing ever happened.

    With that everything works out fine.
  • m0d0nne11 - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    I'm hoping that you'll please, Please, PLEASE offer some gorgeous systems like these but specifically intended to run Linux!
  • Denithor - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    It's worth noting that the Silverstone build was $20 higher priced than the Crucial build - exactly the price difference between the 950 and 960 cards. The Crucial build, including the 960, would be much stronger for gaming and the better machine overall - at almost the exact same price point as the Silverstone rig.
  • Mangosteen - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    You could've at least extended the giveaway to Canada and the UK sheesh
  • Casecutter - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Well as I find *no* reviews for that single fan EVGA 950, all we can go by are several Eggviews that do discuss the heat and noise aspects of the card. "Really pushes it hard and it gets extremely hot. I have their EVGA Precision software to control voltage and fan speed, it has to run the fan at 2000 and higher to keep it from hitting 80C and higher. I've gotten to stay around low 70's so far, but it does run pretty hot".... "Fan when under load kicks into high gear and is not very quiet, though I am not saying this thing is a jet engine either."... "Fan usually doesn't kick in until it needs to, this keeps the noise down when not under load."

    Sure the 380 has to dissipate ~25% more watts under load, but the PowerColor PCS+ has a very compact 3 heat-pipe lay-out for it's size, and the fans turn-off at ide also. I see two fans and heat pipe cooler doing better than I think what's a fairly smallish extrusion (or is that a stamping) very had to tell what's under there. Honestly, a single fan and whatever cooler is under there vs. a 3 pipe cooler and two fans, I might say there's either zero difference in noise, or the PCS+ might be quieter. If the EVGA was a rear exhaust I might say it had merit... But just because it supposed lower power, a single fan, and ITX size does it instantly mean it will run cooler or produce less noise.

    If it about gaming that PCS+ is the hands down BfB, and I'd rather buy something I know what's under the hood.
  • isaac12345 - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Giving up performance on both builds just to fit in a SSD is so darn silly. The first build can easily fit the other's CPU if it gives up the SSD. It can even include a 7200rpm drive instead of a 5400. The pentium is so not future proof as games already ask for 4 cores without hacks and overclocking it to get performance in such a small case will certainly pose problems.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, November 5, 2015 - link

    Buying a computer of any sort beyond an absolute cheapest piece of crap on the shelf in worstbuy race to the bottom failbox/failbook without an SSD is even sillier. A system that's crippled by only having a spinning HDD will inflict pain on the user all the time with brief random pauses due to the appallingly slow and high latency IO.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now