People underspend on peripherals. There, I said it. Paying up for quality, be it a keyboard, a mouse, or a gaming headset, usually results in a measurably better experience. I watched my best friend's boyfriend's face light up when he started talking about the Corsair K70 keyboard I recommended to him, and it's not an unusual reaction: people often don't know how good things can be.

Gaming headsets are a trickier proposition. First, audiophiles should just close this review now, because these products straight up aren't for you. That's not to say these headsets offer poor sound quality, but they're not calibrated for and not designed for studio accurate sound. Their primary reasons for being are to produce an immersive gaming experience with usable positional audio and to offer decent microphone communication for VoIP. For these products, the issues turn into whether or not the headset is comfortable, sound is at least of palatable quality, the positional audio is effective, and the features included are useful.

Logitech G230
Basic Stereo Sound, $59

The G230 isn't quite Logitech's "entry level" headset, but it's definitely a barebones affair. Fit and feel with glasses on wasn't ideal but was pretty good. You're not going to need Logitech's G-series software for this kit, which only uses minijacks for the headphone and mic connections. The in-line control unit allows you to adjust volume and toggle the microphone on and off.

Its best feature is that it has very strong, eardrum rattling bass and produces a pretty crisp sound overall. This is a fine headset, but if you're gunning for a barebones gaming set, the G230 really isn't worth the $59, especially not when the vastly superior G430 is only $20 more.

Logitech G430
Simulated 7.1 Surround Sound, $79

It's pretty reasonable to assume the G430 is just a G230 with a G-series USB dongle, but that dongle is easily worth the added $20. The G430 includes all the trimmings of the G230, but the dongle enables you to use Logitech's redesigned and very useful desktop gaming software suite to produce simulated 7.1 surround sound.

Bass is as boomy as ever, and while the positional audio subjectively felt better than the G230, it still seemed a little bit off compared to the Razer Kraken 7.1. I tested the G430 in the declining-due-to-piss-poor-management MechWarrior Online and in Doom 3: BFG Edition; in the latter, I was mostly able to get a bead on targets and the atmospheric sound was quite good. Of the four headsets I've tested here, this is probably the one I'm most likely to use due to its fairly smart combination of features.

Razer Kraken 7.1
Simulated 7.1 Surround Sound, $99

The Razer Kraken 7.1 is a gaming headset, full stop. There are no minijacks or dongles; the entire headset uses a single USB connection only. Of the four headsets tested, I felt the Kraken 7.1 had the best positional audio, allowing you to calibrate it fairly precisely to your individual hearing. I also found overall sound quality to be the best balanced and nuanced; the Logitechs sound great but their default bass is a little too boomy and eardrum-rattling.

So why isn't it my favorite? In my estimation, Razer makes two fatal miscalculations. First, and most practically, is the lack of in-line audio control of any kind. The Kraken 7.1 uses software volume control, and there's no in-line microphone mute, and these are both features I was pretty desperate for. The second miscalculation is a more subtle one: like any major vendor, Razer wants to get you into their ecosystem. While their Synapse 2.0 software isn't bad, having to actually create an account and log in just to use any of the advanced features of your Razer product is irritating. Their software ecosystem should be opt-in; install the drivers and just use the headset and whatever other Razer products you might have, and then you have the option to create and log in to your Razer account if you want to use their cloud-based settings and services.

SteelSeries Siberia V2
Simulated "3D" Sound, $66

Of the four headsets I tested, the Siberia V2 was pretty easily my least favorite. That's a shame, because it's also the most comfortable one despite not being adjustable. SteelSeries has tried to make their product very flexible in terms of usability, with a series of adapter cables included in the package. What we're still dealing with, though, is a standard headphone/mic combination that feeds into a USB dongle, and unfortunately that's where things take a turn.

The dongle uses bone stock Realtek drivers with a simulated 7.1 surround mode that can be calibrated but has no testing mode short of actually going into a game and just checking by feel. There's an in-line volume control for both the mic and the headphones if you do use the USB dongle, along with a mic switch. The LiveMix settings theoretically allow you to control how audible VoIP is as opposed to standard game sound, but ultimately it's both not relevant and not enough to make up for the Siberia V2's middling audio quality and awful positional sound. You're paying for the idea of positional sound and cross-compatibility with the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360, but you're undoubtedly better off just going with Logitech's less expensive and better quality G230.

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • nathanddrews - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    I've spent years underpaying for headsets, just "getting by" on whatever $10 special I could get and it was always frustrating. I even got to the point of using my Xbox 360 headset plugged into my controller (plugged in via USB) in order to have a quality mic. I have a massive cranium, so nothing has ever worked that well.

    That is until my wife bought me a Logitech G930. It's the best headset I've ever owned, but I've never owned one over $20 before.
  • KarmaKrissy - Sunday, July 19, 2015 - link

    I used a Logitech G930 myself for years. I then took a step up and went for the SteelSeries H after seeing this guide - definitely more expensive but well worth it IMO if you're a hardcore gamer like me. Don't get me wrong, the Logitech is a steal for when you're on a budget, and is also highly rated in that same list, but it really can't compete with the SteelSeries H (it is wireless, has surround sound, and the mic is retractable unlike many other products) - everything you'd need in a gaming headset.
  • Sandcat - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    Previously I used Roccat Kaves, until I learned that 5.1 headphones are a gimmick, and got a set of Audio Technica 700's, and stuck a Zalman mic on them. Soundstage is brilliant, couldn't be happier.
  • Bull Dog - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    I use Roccat Kave 'true' 5.1 Headphones. They are no gimmick, with them I can discern sounds that are coming from behind, from the ones in front of me. I used a couple of pairs of simulated surround headphones once, and I was not impressed. They just didn't achieve the same effect as real surround headphones do for me.
  • Sandcat - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    I agree that they Kave's have 5.1 sound. The bass on them is far greater than the stuff on my ATH-700's, what with the rumble effect and all. I used the same soundcard with both cans. The Kaves have far smaller drivers, so that might have something to do with it, but the sound stage on the 700's blew them away. The Kave's have nice punch, but I have far greater positional accuracy with the 700's. I still have the Kaves and go back to them every once in a while to make sure I'm using the right ones. Every time I confirm my 700's as superior.

    I wouldn't simulate 5.1 either, to get a pair of stereo speakers to give surround sound. Instead I urge you to beg/borrow/steal a pair and watch the virtual barber: to determine how good they are. With your eyes closed.
  • theNiZer - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    I am shocked that you did not include Sennheiser, see:

    U 320 is great stuff:
  • DanNeely - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    Sennheiser probably declined to send a review sample. Ad banner revenue isn't high enough to go out and buy hardware to test; so review sites are mostly limited to what the vendors are willing to provide.
  • Maltz - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    I have a Sennheiser headset I've used for roughly 5 years. They are amazingly great. Comfortable to wear for hours on end, good sound, good mic placement so that it picks up you and not the whole room, inline volume and mute, small USB dongle or minijacks... the works! It even came with a thing to wind extra cord around to keep it out of the way. Very well thought out headset.
  • HOSH - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    I have owned the Sennheiser HMD 280-13 Pro DJ/Custom 300ohm headset for 6+ years and they still sound great and I can pick up footsteps behind me in game. It was the only closed surround headset with a mic boom from them back then that was reasonable. It will be picking up a PC 350 and PC 360 or similar series in the next year to replace what I have for gaming.
  • Cow86 - Friday, August 30, 2013 - link

    Interesting that you find the Steelseries Siberia V2 so bad...I own them, but mine have no USB connection, and no inbuilt audio. So apparerently there are different versions of these... Mine plug directly into my ASUS Xonar sound card, and the audio quality is far superior to my logitech headset that I owned prior. Also very comfortable as you say.

    They do have one problem though, that apparently is fairly common with quality isn't so great. In my case the mic has developed a loose connection when extended, so I've had to stop using it as I just don't know if my voice is going through or not otherwise. Good thing I have another mic.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now