Window Management: Split View & Mission Control

Although Apple’s application updates are likely to have the greatest impact for day-to-day users, that’s far from the only place the company has been working on improving the state of the OS versus Yosemite. As it turns out, Apple has also been busy working on window management, adding some new features here and revising the operation of other systems to bring about new functionality.

To address the elephant in the room first, Apple has added an interesting solution to the problem of finding the mouse cursor. With El Capitan, shaking the cursor – be it waving a mouse around or moving your fingers quickly about the trackpad – will cause the cursor to momentarily enlarge. Bad (and obvious) jokes aside, this feature is exactly as stupid as it sounds like. And in the process it becomes stupidly clever.

Cursor Magnification

Although OS magnification is nothing new – OS X has had it practically forever – using magnification on just the cursor, and just temporarily at that, is a clever way to momentarily increase the visibility of a cursor. And the thrashing about is exactly how most people go about finding their cursor if they lose it (since humans are more sensitive to motion than detail), which makes this a very natural action. At the end of the day it strikes me as something that an engineer came up with in whatever Apple’s equivalent of “20% time” is, but it’s a dumb, effective little feature.

Moving on, let’s talk about what’s new with window management in El Capitan. Apple’s Mission Control feature is receiving some well-deserved attention with the latest version of OS X, and while there are no major changes here, Apple has made a number of smaller changes in an attempt to improve window management through it.

Mission Control: Now With A Single Layer

Window tiling in Mission Control has been adjusted to be flatter; no longer do windows belonging to the same application stack on top of each other, but instead they are laid out separately like another application. This is a pretty straightforward binary choice – you either stack windows or you don’t – but Apple seems convinced that hiding windows by stacking them was counter-productive (and they’re probably right). Meanwhile, how Mission Control and Spaces interact has been improved, and it is now possible to drag an application in Mission Control mode up in to Spaces to have that application put in its own space as a full screen mode application. Previously it was possible to drag applications into other spaces, but the option to go immediately into full screen mode is new.

The reason for that change makes a lot more sense when we talk about the other major window management change in El Capitan, which is a new feature Apple calls Split View. Similar to Microsoft’s (Aero) Snap feature, Split View is based around the idea of setting up applications side-by-side such that each application goes full screen and takes up one side of the screen. The intention being to make it easier to focus on just using two applications side-by-side, with each application as large as it can be.

Split View: Safari & Notes

Given that background, Split View is unsurprisingly an additional function of full screen mode. Activating it is simply a matter of holding down the full screen button rather than tapping it, at which point it becomes possible to move an application to either side of the screen and to engage Split View. Doing so will then cause all other application windows to be tiled (ala Mission Control) in order to pick the other application to be used in Split View mode. It’s also possible to engage Split View via Mission Control and Spaces, dragging an application to a Space that already has a full screen application. Finally, split View mode also automatically creates a new space for the view (assuming it wasn’t already a full screen application in its own space), so the desktop remains available in another space.

Split View: Adjusting Ratios

As far as compatibility and adjustability go, in Split View each half of the screen is adjustable, at least up to a point. This seems to depend on the application, but we have been able to increase the split to 66/33 or so. Meanwhile compatibility is fairly good with Apple’s applications, but it’s clear that this feature can only work with applications that have a full screen mode and have the ability to be resized to fit. System Preferences, for example, can’t go Split View.

Split View: Picking The Right Application

Overall Split View is an interesting take on what else to do with full screen applications, and while it lacks a high degree of novelty since it has been done elsewhere before, Apple has clearly put some effort into polishing it and using Spaces to resolve the blindness that comes from filling up the screen. That said, given the fact that one of iOS 9’s marquee features for the iPad Air 2 is multitasking, which implements the same Split View feature, I’m not sure how much of Split View’s presence here is out of its usefulness in a desktop environment, and how much of it is based on the desire to keep iOS and OS X in harmony. I’m curious to see just how often it gets used on OS X as a result.

Applications, Cont: Mail & Photos Spotlight Gets Smarter: Web & Natural Language Search
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Michael Bay - Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - link

    They are just taking after Canonical and their cringeworthy OS release codename tradition.
  • vol7ron - Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - link

    Just curious what your opinion is about Lollipop... or JellyBean... or Ice Cream Sandwich. Android names in general are making fun at the use of names for OS versions. Regardless if they are keeping the names in a specific genre.

    I also saw El Capitan and thought it was a poor name choice, but that's less of Apple's fault and more of the Mariposa Batallion, which named it 2 centuries ago. It's a fairly well known structure in Yosemite. It's the people that are quick to judge and maybe not well-traveled that seem to have an issue with it.
  • Alexey291 - Saturday, June 20, 2015 - link

    By not well travelled you mean 'people who don't know every damn landmark in a foreign country'?

    If so then yeah I'm not well travelled. I don't know the name of every rock in every country on earth
  • hanssonrickard - Saturday, June 20, 2015 - link

    Always intersting tht americans think that USA is the center of the world.
    They also most of the times think that everyone else should know so much about locations and names in US.
    Being well-travelled doesn´t even have to involve the US. There are plenty of other countries and places to visit and still be considered "well-travelled".

    For me, I had not heard about El Capitan before Apple mentioned it and I then googled it.
  • Rod_Serling_Lives - Tuesday, June 23, 2015 - link

    You took a comment where the word choice wasn't the best and produced a response that is just as ignorant. Kudos to you!
  • whyso - Monday, June 15, 2015 - link

    Its marketing. And its a stupid name. Sure it might be good and function well but it still has (in my opinion) a stupid name. People aren't going to see some california landmark they are going to see 'the captain'.
  • melgross - Monday, June 15, 2015 - link

    Ok, we get it, you've got a bug up your ass about it, now leave it alone.
  • jameskatt - Tuesday, June 16, 2015 - link

    Windows is a stupid name. It can't even be trademarked.
  • Oxford Guy - Wednesday, June 17, 2015 - link

    And the new Finder icon is terrible.
  • shabby - Monday, June 15, 2015 - link

    Even referring it to 10.11 doesn't make sense because 10.2 to 10.9 is technically newer than 10.11.
    Maybe if they called them 10.01, 10.02 and so forth... right?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now