First Look: Viewsonic G Tablet and Tegra 2 Performance Previewby Vivek Gowri on December 9, 2010 3:04 AM EST
The slate computing market is about to explode, with a literal flood of new tablets releasing over the coming months. Many of them will be Android based, running Nvidia’s Tegra 2 SoC. Nvidia made a big deal about Tegra 2 back at CES 2010, but for some reason, it’s taken quite a bit of time for anything running the platform to hit the market. Finally, we have one - the Viewsonic G Tablet.
The Tegra 2-based Viewsonic G Tablet showing the Tap UI homescreen
The specs are pretty straightforward; we’ve got a 10” WSVGA display with LED backlighting, Android 2.2 with a specialized UI skin on top, a 16GB microSD card, 2.4GHz 802.11n, Bluetooth 2.1, a 27 Whr lithium ion battery, and the Tegra 2 SoC. The dual-core Cortex A9 is clocked at a nice, round 1 GHz, and there’s 512MB of LPDDR RAM on board. The GPU is Nvidia’s Ultra-Low Power GeForce GPU and there are separate HD video encode and decode blocks also onboard. But the big deal with Tegra 2, as Anand went over in his first look at the SoC, is Cortex A9. The A9 is an out of order architecture with a relatively short pipeline, so it should be significantly faster than the in-order A8 on a per-clock basis.
But before we get to the performance aspect, let’s give the tablet a once over. The Viewsonic is not the most interesting physical specimen, just a screen with a thin bezel around it. From the front, it looks nearly identical to the Galaxy Tab and any number of other tablets on the market. The sides are pretty plain, with volume buttons at the top and a dock connector and mic at the bottom. The left side has a mini USB port, a headphone jack, and a power jack, while there are speakers on either side. The back is filled with logos - Viewsonic, the gTablet logo, the American distributor’s logo, barcode, FCC ID, etc - but otherwise pretty plain. Build quality is actually pretty decent and the tablet has a pretty weighty feel in hand. There’s no flex anywhere, and while the casing doesn’t feel particularly high quality, it’s not low quality by any means. There are some touches in the industrial design that make it seem a bit cheap. The capacitive touch buttons are off-center and easy to press inadvertently, and the physical buttons are placed pretty haphazardly. One thing that really threw me off is the volume rocker, which is switched from the logical layout (volume up is the lower button, volume down is the upper button).
The Viewsonic (left) next to the Samsung Galaxy Tab, both on maximum brightness, to illustrate the viewing angles of both tablets
But for $399 for a Tegra 2 tablet, minor quibbles about build quality and industrial design are about what one should expect. I also expected a not-so-great screen, but not like this. I know that not everyone can splurge like Apple did and go for an IPS screen, but when you look at the TN panels in these and other tablets, it really does make sense. The problem isn’t contrast ratio, the 432:1 figure is actually pretty good for a netbook screen and much better than most small notebooks. It doesn't match the iPad's amazing 934:1 contrast ratio, but still, contrast is not the problem. Unfortunately, the max brightness is not that high at 186nits, which only exacerbates the terrible viewing angles. Something I’ve realized in using tablets - the viewing angles matter a whole lot more than they do in laptops. As is typical with widescreen displays, the horizontal viewing angle is decent, but the vertical viewing angle is pretty bad - anything more than 30 degrees off center and the screen completely washes out. If I try to lay it flat on my desk and use it like my iPad or the Galaxy Tab, it’s basically impossible to see anything on the screen. For a device with a usage model so heavily dependant on good off-center viewing angles, speccing a screen with poor viewing angles was a pretty big oversight.
Viewsonic's Tap UI landscape split keyboard in the revised browser interface
Viewsonic loaded their own Tap UI onto the G Tablet. It’s a decent looking UI, but it’s aggravatingly slow and makes most of the navigation through the OS pretty painful. As with most tablets, there’s no Market preinstalled on the G Tablet (Samsung is the exception here, since they have managed to work around the Android Market restrictions). However, the XDA developers forum is your friend - there’s a simple workaround to get Market and other Google applications enabled, and it’s also possible to disable the UI skin. We’ll go over the software package and hacking aspects of the G Tablet in the full review; for now just know that the preloaded UI is pretty terrible, you'll want to disable it as soon as possible.
The G Tablet (center) next to the Galaxy Tab (left) and T-Mobile G2 (right)
Our first impressions of the G Tablet, beyond the woeful viewing angles and the unfortunate UI skin, is actually that of a fairly usable budget tablet. The user experience is actually pretty decent once you get out of the main UI and into an app or a browser window, and the split keyboard in landscape mode is much better than expected. The tablet has a nice, weighty feel in hand, but if you're using it in landscape mode, it might feel a little heavy for one-handed operation. The touchscreen is responsive enough, though it doesn't feel quite as sensitive as the Galaxy Tab or the iPad. That could just be because of the overall sluggishness of the UI, but we'll see about that after I load the stock Android UI onto the G Tablet. We'll see, but at first brush it looks like the main problems with the Viewsonic are the screen and the UI. We'll have a full review later on with more complete impressions and battery life numbers, but for now, we'll leave you with a preview of Tegra 2 performance.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
melgross - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkI agree. Since this is a TABLET, and not a phone, it would have been nicer if it were compared to the iPad, rather than to the iPhone, which also has the chip running at 800MHz, rather than the 1GHz the iPad runs at.
And, also, yes, battery life tests are very important. The three things that seem most important is screen quality, snappiness or sluggishness, and battery life. My iPad, with its Cortex 8 never seems sluggish. The screen is excellent. And the battery life is also excellent. How do these tablets compare in all three areas?
jtsmall - Saturday, December 11, 2010 - linkI'm seeing 10+ hours in use and nil drain in sleep.
DukeN - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkThis would be appreciated - though I'm fairly confident the (max)ipad will trail in similar benches across platforms.
melgross - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkThat lame name hasn't been funny since before the iPad actually came out. Is that the best you can do?
Shadowmaster625 - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkIt has always been funny, but not as funny as a bunch of dumb yuppies wiping their hoohas with $600 pads and then throwing them away 6 months later for the latest in slave wage gadgetry.
melgross - Saturday, December 11, 2010 - linkI guess you're a redneck with no money, but a lot of jealousy then.
enderwiggin21 - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkThe literal definition of "flood" says:
1a. a rising and overflowing of a body of water especially onto normally dry land; also : a condition of overflowing
2. the flowing in of the tide
3. an overwhelming quantity or volume; also : a state of abundant flow or volume —often used in the phrase in full flood
semo - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkThose mobile device makers need to get a clue stat! Hopefully tablets highlight the problem and possibly lead to better notebook screens too
xipo - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkafter looking the way the Google Nexus One performes with an old Snapdragon QSD8250, one can only wish there where a Google Nexus TAB :D that would be a mayor win... because clearly the hardware is worthless without proper software optimization.. so, you should update this charts as soon as the google nexus S comes out.
Fritzr - Thursday, December 9, 2010 - linkLiteral means "as written" lierally "in strict accord with accepted definition"
Flood means a large volume of X. When X is omitted, water is assumed. "A flood" is a deluge of water. "A flood of X" is a deluge of X. In context, flood and flooding can refer to other things by default. for example forum flooding does not refer to a suddent inumdation of the forum by water, if not explicitly declared, it defaults to large amounts of information or posts appearing suddenly. Deluge, rain and inundate are used in a similar manner.
Unabridged dictionaries recognize this form of usage and document it. Abridged dictionaries by definition are incomplete with their editors making conscious choices as to words and definition that will not be included.
Since the definition states a large amount of X suddenly appearing especially in a place where there was no X, flood was being use literally.