Capping off a multi-year development process, Samsung’s foundry group sends word this morning that the company has officially kicked off production on its initial 3nm chip production line. Samsung’s 3nm process is the industry’s first commercial production process node using gate-all-around transistor (GAAFET) technology, marking a major milestone for the field of silicon lithography, and potentially giving Samsung a major boost in its efforts to compete with TSMC.

The relatively spartan announcement from Samsung, which comes on the final day of Q2, announces that Samsung has begun production of chips on a GAAFET-enabled 3nm production line. The company is not disclosing the specific version of the node used here, but based on previous Samsung roadmaps, this is undoubtedly Samsung’s initial 3GAE process – essentially, Samsung’s earliest process node within a family. According to Samsung, the line will initially be used to produce chips for “high performance, low power computing”, with mobile processors to come later. Samsung’s early process nodes are traditionally reserved for the company’s internal use, so while Samsung isn’t announcing any specific 3nm chips today, it’s only a matter of time until we see a 3nm SoC announces from Samsung LSI.

Samsung has, for the most part, been quiet about its progress on 3nm/GAAFET this year. The last significant news we heard from the company on the matter was several months ago at the company’s Foundry Forum event, where the company reiterated plans to get 3GAE into production by the end of 2022. Given the previous silence and the cutting-edge nature of the technology, there had been more than some concern that 3GAE would be delayed past 2022 – adding on to delays that pushed the tech out of its original 2021 launch window – but with today’s announcement Samsung seems to want to put that to rest.

With that said, the devil is in the detail in these announcements, especially as to what’s said versus not said. Taken literally, today’s announcement from Samsung notably does not include any mention of “high volume” manufacturing, which is the traditional milestone for when a process node is ready for commercial use. So by merely saying 3nm is in production, Samsung’s announcement leaves the company with a fair bit of wiggle room with regards to just how many chips they’re capable of producing – and at what yields. The company was producing test chips back in 2021, so the matter is more nuanced than just firing up the fab, so the line between PR and productization is fuzzy, to say the least.

Still, today’s announcement is a major moment for Samsung, who has been working on 3nm/GAAFET technology since before 2019, when they initially announced the technology. Samsung’s specific flavor of GAA transistor technology is Multi Bridge Channel FET (MBCFET), which is a nanosheet-based implementation. Nanosheet-based FETs are extremely customizable, and the width of the nanosheet is a key metric in defining the power and performance characteristics: the higher the width, the higher the performance (at higher power). As a result, transistor designs that focus on low power can use smaller nanosheets, while logic that requires higher performance can go for the wider sheets.

Along with today’s production announcement, Samsung has also offered some updated size and performance figures comparing 3GAE to older nodes. Officially, 3GAE can offer 45% reduced power consumption or 23% improved performance compared to Samsung’s 5nm process (the company doesn’t state which flavor), with an overall reduction in feature size of 16%. These figures are notably different from Samsung’s previous (2019) figures, which compared the tech to Samsung’s 7LPP node. Given the change in baselines, it’s not clear at this point whether 3GAE is living up to Samsung’s initial claims, or if they’ve had to back off a bit for the initial version of their 3nm technology.

What is clear, however, is that Samsung has more significant improvements in mind for the second iteration of 3nm, which we know is 3GAP(lus). According to today’s press release, Samsung is expecting a 50% power reduction or 30% performance improvement versus the same 5nm baseline, with a much greater 35% area reduction. Today’s announcement doesn’t offer a date for 3GAP, but per previous roadmaps, 3GAP is expected to land around a year after 3GAE. 3GAP is also when we expect to see Samsung open the door to outside customers, though given the harsh competitive environment, nothing should be taken for granted.

Samsung Process Roadmap (July 2021)

The launch of Samsung’s 3nm process tech comes as the company is working to regain its footing against arch rival TSMC, who has clearly pulled into the lead in the 5nm/4nm generation. The gap between TSMC and Samsung has been wide enough that major customers such as Qualcomm have been porting high-performance chips like the Snapdragon 8 series from Samsung to TSMC, and at this point Samsung has seen few major 5nm/4nm wins compared to TSMC. If everything goes well, being the first fab with GAAFET tech could give Samsung a temporary-but-material advantage over TSMC, whose 3nm process is still using older FinFET-style transistors. But in order to pull that off, Samsung will need to reverse their earlier technical problems and deliver a performant, high-yielding process that’s far enough ahead to woo skeptical customers.

Source: Samsung

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Kamen Rider Blade - Thursday, July 14, 2022 - link

    China will start WW3 if they try to do that.

    And the US vs China will be a Hot Conflict.
  • Kangal - Thursday, June 30, 2022 - link

    These comparisons of the new Samsung 3nm are against their old 5nm node. And that node wasn't great, it was basically competing against the older 7nm/8nm node from TSMC. So we don't know how this really compares to the competition.

    With these "huge" advances on their New 3nm Samsung node, keen to see how it compares to the likes of the current TSMC 4nm/5nm. If they can beat them overall (price, area, performance, efficiency) then I'll be impressed. But I am not impressed by mere changing of the number/name of the node. With delays from TSMC for their 3nm, maybe Samsung can catch up to them or even leap-frog them. Heck it is totally possible that TSMC's delayed-3nm is inferior to Samsung's early-3nm. Let's hope it is the latter, so competition really heats up!
  • ballsystemlord - Thursday, June 30, 2022 - link

    So, you want Intel to win then... ;)
    You did say you wished TSMC to hit a snag and Samsung to cache up. That means Intel pulls ahead.
  • Wereweeb - Friday, July 1, 2022 - link

    Intel's roadmaps are as trustworthy as an anti-mask flat earther - who knows what they'll do next, defend drunk driving? Even if they do end up matching TSMC in transistor density, they will have to do so by using more expensive High-NA EUV - they'll be buying their way into technically "catching up" while TSMC happily makes a bucketload of money.

    Just like Samsung is moving to GAA early because they can't compete with TSMC's FinFETs, which means Samsung is "catching up" by depressing their own margins and volume.
  • FreckledTrout - Thursday, June 30, 2022 - link

    You have a point, but the big upside is they are moving to GAA. That is a huge change process wise. TSMC's first GAA node 2nm also won't have backside power delivery so it won't be a huge jump either. I think it's very wise to not get too aggressive on the first GAA nodes for all of the companies.
  • Doug_S - Thursday, June 30, 2022 - link

    Sounds like is basically equivalent to Intel's "internal node" before their 20A process. Or equivalent to what TSMC terms "risk production".

    If you aren't making it available to third parties, is it really even an official foundry node? There's a lot of room for puffed up claims where they say they are ahead of everyone else without any actual products showing up until Galaxy S23 next spring (for the Exynos models)

    What does Samsung's internal semiconductor division make aside from Exynos and DRAM/NAND that could use this process before then?

    If it walks like risk production and talks like risk production...
  • Doug_S - Thursday, June 30, 2022 - link

    I should have clarified, I mentioned DRAM/NAND because that's mostly what Samsung makes aside from Exynos, but only Exynos could use this new process. I know DRAM/NAND are on a totally different process train.
  • Kamen Rider Blade - Thursday, July 14, 2022 - link

    Maybe Intel should have it's CPU Design & Chip manufacturing seperated into two seperate businesses with the Chip manufacturing side open to all companies.
  • isofilm - Thursday, June 30, 2022 - link

    I don't know which is more pathetic:

    Samsung's one false start after another, which has resulted in ZERO top 20 customers, or

    The stooges holding BLANK wafers (perhaps a sign of what's to come)
  • donalderic858 - Tuesday, July 26, 2022 - link

    Wawa does its best to provide accurate information on allergens its menu items are prepared fresh in its kitchens, and there is always the possibility of cross-contact to other allergens.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now