The Google Pixel XL Review: Life After Nexus
by Matt Humrick & Brandon Chester on November 8, 2016 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Smartphones
- Mobile
- Snapdragon 821
- Pixel

The Nexus brand has been around for nearly seven years now. As technology matured, the Nexus phones demonstrated consistent improvement from one generation to the next; however, the brand’s inconsistency resulted in a series of seemingly one-off devices rather than a cohesive family. Screen size steadily increased from the original Nexus One’s 3.7-inches to 5.96-inches on the Nexus 6, which was then followed by two smaller-screened models the next year—the 5.2-inch Nexus 5X and 5.7-inch Nexus 6P. Price too has fluctuated over the years: After the Nexus One launched at $529, subsequent models jumped back and forth between the midrange and flagship categories, with launch prices dropping as low as $299 and reaching up to $699. Even the naming convention has varied: one phone used letters (Nexus S), one used numbers in letter form (Nexus One), some used numbers that roughly correlated with screen size, some used numbers and letters (Nexus 5X and 6P), and there was even a Galaxy thrown in.
The one feature shared by all Nexus devices, the one that sets them apart from all other Android phones, is the software—a pure Google experience that’s free from OEM and carrier bloatware with access to timely software and security updates directly from Google. The fact that Google, predominantly a software and services company, needs to commission its own line of phones to showcase Android’s latest features speaks to the fractured nature of the Android ecosystem and the sorry state of software support among OEMs and carriers. Even a year after its release, only 19% of devices are running Android 6 and less than 1% are running Android 7, which was released nearly three months ago. This means that 80% of all Android devices are running an operating system that’s at least two major versions old, according to Google.
Google’s latest phones, the Pixel and Pixel XL, still provide that pure Android experience along with at least two years of timely software and security updates, but the new branding is about more than clearing away the Nexus naming clutter. Google is now asserting more control over hardware development, ostensibly to deliver a more cohesive, premium experience centered around artificial intelligence (AI) and Google’s ever-expanding Knowledge Graph, a semantic-search system that catalogs objects and the many connections between them. The new Google Assistant, an integral part of the Pixel experience, serves as a gateway, allowing you to query this treasure trove of data using natural voice commands and contextual queues from the environment.
Google is also pushing for a more unified VR experience with new features in Android 7 and its Daydream View VR headset and controller that works with Daydream-ready phones like the Pixel and Pixel XL. Because of its steep hardware requirements—accurate sensors for head tracking, high-resolution displays, powerful processors—VR will be limited to flagship phones initially.
Google’s Pixel branding may also be seen as a shot across the bow by its Android partners, who rely on an impartial Google to provide them with an operating system and an equal opportunity to compete in the hardware market. The last time Google tried building and selling its own hardware running its own operating system, which occurred several years ago during its ill-fated acquisition of Motorola Mobility, Samsung almost jumped ship, threatening to use the Tizen mobile operating system instead. Google clamped down and persuaded Samsung to stay with Android, and after it sold its Motorola unit to Lenovo, the waves subsided. In the years since, Google has placed further restrictions on what its partners can do with Android, and now that it’s getting back into the hardware business in a roundabout manner, selling phones that directly compete with its partner’s products, competitive tempers could flare once again.
Google Pixel Phones (2016) | ||||
Google Pixel | Google Pixel XL | Google Nexus 5X | Google Nexus 6P | |
SoC | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 (MSM8996 Pro AB) 2x Kryo @ 2.15GHz 2x Kryo @ 1.59GHz Adreno 530 @ 624MHz |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 (MSM8992) 4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.44GHz 2x Cortex-A57 @ 1.82GHz Adreno 418 @ 600MHz |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 v2.1 (MSM8994) 4x Cortex-A53 @ 1.56GHz 4x Cortex-A57 @ 1.95GHz Adreno 430 @ 600MHz |
|
Display | 5.0-inch 1920x1080 AMOLED | 5.5-inch 2560x1440 AMOLED | 5.2-inch 1920x1080 IPS LCD | 5.7-inch 2560x1440 SAMOLED |
Dimensions | 143.8 x 69.5 x 7.3-8.5 mm | 154.7 x 75.7 x 7.3-8.5 mm | 147.0 x 72.6 x 7.9 mm 136 grams |
159.3 x 77.8 x 7.3 mm 178 grams |
RAM | 4GB LPDDR4 | 2GB LPDDR3 | 3GB LPDDR4 | |
NAND | 32GB / 128GB (UFS 2.0) | 16GB / 32GB (eMMC 5.0) | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB (eMMC 5.0) | |
Battery | 2770 mAh non-replaceable |
3450 mAh (13.28 Wh) non-replaceable |
2700 mAh (10.3 Wh) non-replaceable |
3450 mAh (13.18 Wh) non-replaceable |
Front Camera | 8MP, 1/3.2" Sony IMX179 Exmor R, 1.4µm pixels, f/2.4 | 5MP, 1/4" OmniVision OV5693, 1.4μm pixels, f/2.0 | 8MP, 1/3.2" Sony IMX179 Exmor R, 1.4μm pixels, f/2.4 | |
Rear Camera | 12.3MP, 1/2.3" Sony IMX378 Exmor RS, 1.55µm pixels, f/2.0, PDAF + Laser AF, HDR+, dual LED flash | 12.3MP, 1/2.3” Sony IMX377 Exmor R, 1.55µm pixels, f/2.0, Laser AF, Auto HDR, dual-tone LED flash | 12.3MP, 1/2.3” Sony IMX377 Exmor R, 1.55µm pixels, f/2.0, Laser AF, Auto HDR, dual-tone LED flash | |
Modem | Qualcomm X12 LTE (Integrated) 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 12) |
Qualcomm X10 LTE (Integrated) 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 6) |
Qualcomm X10 LTE (Integrated) 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Category 9) |
|
SIM Size | NanoSIM | NanoSIM | NanoSIM | |
Wireless | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2x2 MU-MIMO, BT 4.2, NFC, GPS/GNSS | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2x2 MU-MIMO, BT 4.2, NFC, GPS/GNSS | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac 2x2 MU-MIMO, BT 4.2, NFC, GPS/GNSS | |
Connectivity | USB 3.0 Type-C, 3.5mm headset | USB 2.0 Type-C, 3.5mm headset | USB 2.0 Type-C, 3.5mm headset | |
Launch OS | Android 7.1 | Android 6.0 | Android 6.0 | |
Launch Price | $649 / $749 32GB / 128GB |
$769 / $869 32GB / 128GB |
$379 / $429 16GB / 32GB |
$499 / $549 / $649 32GB / 64GB / 128 GB |
Powering the Pixel’s VR and machine learning experiences is Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 821 SoC. The biggest difference between the 821 and the Snapdragon 820 that powers most of the flagship devices released earlier in the year are higher peak frequencies for the CPUs and GPU. However, the Pixel’s four Kryo CPU cores and Adreno 530 GPU use the same peak frequencies as the Snapdragon 820, negating the 821’s performance boost.
The Snapdragon 821 SoC is backed by 4GB of LPDDR4 RAM, which should prove sufficient for heavy multitasking. The Pixels come with either 32GB or 128GB of UFS 2.0 NAND, and like the Nexus phones before them, there’s no microSD card support for storage expansion. Instead, Google expects Pixel owners to leverage its cloud storage and is offering unlimited backups for photos and videos. This should help alleviate at least some storage pressure when paired with Android’s Smart Storage feature, which automatically removes photos and videos that have been backed up, although the stock phone's 32GB of internal storage may still prove inadequate, especially for people who want to watch videos offline. For those users who do need more space, Google offers 128GB models as a premium option.
The Pixels’ wireless capabilities are equal to other premium flagships, including dual spatial stream 802.11a/b/g/n/ac Wi-Fi (2.4GHz and 5GHz), Bluetooth 4.2, and NFC for use with Android Pay. There’s also a Qualcomm X12 LTE baseband processor integrated into the Snapdragon 821 SoC that supports speeds of up to 600 Mbps on the downlink (3x20MHz carrier aggregation with 256-QAM) and 75 Mbps on the uplink (1x20MHz with 64-QAM).
Frequency Band Support | ||
North America | Rest of World | |
FDD-LTE | 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 13 / 17 / 20 / 25 / 26 / 28 / 29 / 30 | 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 7 / 8 / 12 / 13 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 26 / 28 / 32 |
TDD-LTE | 41 | 38 / 39 / 40 / 41 |
GSM | 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
WCDMA | 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 8 | 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 8 / 9 / 19 |
CDMA | BC0 / BC1 / BC10 | BC0 |
TD-CDMA | - | 34 / 39 |
Rounding out the cellular hardware chain are a pair of Qualcomm RF transceivers, which work together to enable 3x carrier aggregation, and a Qualcomm QFE2550 dynamic antenna matching tuner, the principal piece that enables Qualcomm’s TruSignal Antenna Boost technology, which works to improve reception and reduce power consumption by matching the impedance between the antennas and the RF front end. The Avago and Skyworks power amplifiers include envelope tracking, which saves power by adjusting the power supply to better match the requirements of the output signal.
Google’s Pixel phones come with an impressive list of internal hardware, but it’s not enough to guarantee a premium experience. Hardware calibration, software tuning, and industrial design also play important roles in shaping our overall perception of how a device performs, and this is where Google’s more hands-on approach could pay dividends. Now it’s time to take a closer look at the Pixel XL and determine if it’s really the ultimate Android phone.
250 Comments
View All Comments
deathBOB - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
Sounds like you standard underwhelming HTC product.Any word on the improvements to touch latency that have been talked about? Is it hardware or purely software? And is that part of the UI fluidity that you point out?
David_K - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
The HTC 10 got a VERY positive review here few weeks ago. and in fact, it got positive reviews everywhere, It just couldn't breaks the Galaxy S7 Hype, and don't get me wrong, I LOVE my S7, but the 10 is a really nice and capable device, some would say better than the pixel, with expandable storage, bigger battery, nicer design, MUCH better audio (headphone out and speakers).DM725 - Wednesday, November 9, 2016 - link
My gf loves her HTC 10Speedfriend - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
"Apple's iPhone 7 and 7 Plus do similarly well at 9.22 hours and 9.32 hours, despite the fact that their batteries are significantly smaller than the Pixel XL's. "Why if the batteries are so much smaller, the phones are still so bog, especially the 7 Plkus. What is occupying the additional space? It seems to suggest that Apple would be incapable of moving to a higher res screen without increasing the size of the phone? Anyone with a view?
sor - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
Probably a mix of a few things, but actual Barrett life is one of the reasons I roll my eyes when people complain about Apple making things small at the expense of battery. They still have great life despite being thin.The iPhone is about 1.5mm thinner, that contributes a good deal, and they've also got a larger haptic feedback element. They could increase battery by making it thicker, but I don't imagine they'd need more battery to get higher resolution. They have a leg up on SoC performance to drive those pixels, and they use IPS currently so they could switch to a higher efficiency screen like AMOLED.
name99 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
You do know that you can FIND the answer to your question?:https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/iPhone+7+Plus+Tear...
Part of the answer is a high quality haptics engine. Part is OIS (and two camera housings). Part is a remarkably large primary speaker, and a respectably large secondary speaker.
vikramc - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
Lol .. another isheep spotted . SImply pulling up irrelevant numbers and trying to prop up a iphones . Case in point .. Pixel has a superlative display and this fellow brings in stupid irrelevant numbers from junk . Pixel is at top of the android tree in all means and measures . Accept it and just play with your one plus 3 and samsung junks .fanofanand - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
So verifying the accuracy of the display is "stupid irrelevant numbers from junk"? At least your comment is easily ignored. Maybe you love your oversaturated displays but some of us value accuracy.amdwilliam1985 - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
look at the benchmarks, iPhone wins all benchmarks(the ones that matters) now.lol, looks like the tech world did a 180 in the last few years.
It used to be Android that wins all benchmarks, because that's all they got. Now the tide has reverse, iPhone cares so much about benchmarks now, while Android/Nexus/Pixel cares more about day to day usage. WTH?
BMNify - Tuesday, November 8, 2016 - link
The Auto HDR+ mode and HDR+ On mode are actually very different modes. HDR+ On is the traditional HDR, taking dark and bright exposures and combining them (which is slow). Auto HDR+ is Google's new HDR, which takes 9 dark exposures and combines them to reduce noise and then brightening the dark areas, and since it is continuously taking photos, Auto HDR+ has no shutter lag.Please update the article to include all 3 modes, HDR+ off, Auto HDR+ and HDR+ On.