Content Creation Performance

In order to measure Content Creation performance we used Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2003 and Internet Content Creation SYSMark 2002. First we'll start off with the Winstone benchmark, which is best described by its creators at Veritest:

Multimedia Content Creation Winstone is a system-level, application-based benchmark that measures a PC's overall performance when running top, Windows-based, 32-bit, multimedia content creation applications on Windows 2000 (SP2 or higher), Windows 98, Windows ME, and Windows XP. Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2003 uses the following applications:

Adobe® Photoshop® 7.0
Adobe® Premiere® 6.0
Macromedia® Director 8.5.1
Macromedia® Dreamweaver 4
Microsoft® Windows MediaTM Encoder 7.01.00.3055
Netscape® 6.2.3
NewTek's LightWave® 7.5
Sonic Foundry® Sound Forge® 6.0

Following the lead of real users, Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2003 keeps multiple applications open at once and switches among those applications. Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2003 is a single large test that runs the above applications through a series of scripted activities and returns a single score. Those activities focus on what we call "hot spots," periods of activity that make your PC really work--the times where you're likely to see an hourglass or a progress bar.

Content Creation Performance
Content Creation Winstone 2002 (Score in Winstones - Higher is Better)
Pentium 4 2.66GHz

Pentium-M 1.6GHz

Pentium 4 2.4GHz

Pentium 4 2.2GHz

Pentium-M 1.5GHz

Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Pentium 4 1.6GHz

Pentium 4 1.5GHz

Pentium 4 1.4GHz

37.6

36.1

35.5

33.8

33.0

27.1

25.5

25.2

24.4

|
0
|
8
|
15
|
23
|
30
|
38
|
45

Keeping in mind that the Pentium III had a higher IPC than the Pentium 4, and also remembering that the Pentium-M features a significantly higher IPC than the Pentium III, it's no surprise that a 1.6GHz Pentium-M is able to outperform the fastest Pentium 4-M CPU (2.40GHz) and come within striking range of a desktop 2.66GHz Pentium 4. The 1.5GHz Pentium-M is faster than a 2GHz Pentium 4, and on the heels of a 2.2GHz Pentium 4.

Content Creation Performance
Internet Content Creation SYSMark 2002 (Score in SYSMarks - Higher is Better)

Pentium 4 2.66GHz

Pentium 4 2.4GHz

Pentium 4 2.2GHz

Pentium 4 1.7GHz

Pentium 4 1.6GHz

Pentium 4 1.5GHz

Pentium 4 1.4GHz

Pentium-M 1.6GHz

Pentium-M 1.5GHz



306

296

278

229

220

208

195

184

178

|
0
|
61
|
122
|
184
|
245
|
306
|
367

Internet Content Creation SYSMark 2002 is much more optimized for the Pentium 4's architecture, which is why we find the two Pentium-M processors at the bottom of this chart. Overall content creation performance should be somewhere in between what we see here and what we saw in Content Creation Winstone 2003. One thing is for sure though, the Pentium-M at 1.6GHz is significantly faster than the Pentium 4-M at 1.6GHz.

The Test General Usage Performance
Comments Locked

8 Comments

View All Comments

  • zigCorsair - Wednesday, July 14, 2004 - link

    I thought it was a very informative article. Of course, I'll be upset if it's biased, but being a master's student in CS, many of the exact details I was looking for were in here, and for that I say thank you.
  • Zebo - Monday, May 10, 2004 - link

    I don't see whats so impressive. An athlon mobile 2600/2800 xp 35W version, which runs ~2000Mhz will kill these. To little to late.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 10, 2003 - link

    how the hell could this be a balanced and informative article when in their own analysis they ignored their own data?

    There is no mention of the anamolous nature of the BAPCO test..absolutely NOTHING...

    Its enough for me to question the competency of this site...and even to the point where I suspect that certain unethical compromises have been made.
  • Anonymous User - Wednesday, September 10, 2003 - link

    Yeah, I agree with Sprockkets... same reason Athlon XP loses to the P4 in this benchmark... someone was trying to make the P4 look better, and everything else look worse. Now all the sudden, this new great CPU is getting it's but kicked because of all the P4 optimizations (and probably non-P4 deoptomizations).
  • sprockkets - Tuesday, September 9, 2003 - link

    I wonder why the P4 trashes the PM on Content Creation Performance and nothing else? Maybe it's the stupid skewing toward the P4. Why else would it lose here and kick butt everywhere else? www.theinquirer.net has an article which brought this to readers attention.
  • Anonymous User - Thursday, August 21, 2003 - link

    "Without a trace cache, the design team was forced to develop a more accurate branch predictor unit for the Banias core. Although beyond the scope of this article, Banias was outfitted with a branch predictor significantly superior to what was in the Pentium III. The end result was a reduction of mispredicted branches by around 20%."

    Wouldn't he mean that the branch predictor was superior to the P4?
  • Anonymous User - Tuesday, August 19, 2003 - link

    looks good
  • Anonymous User - Friday, August 8, 2003 - link

    An outstanding well balanced article, after this read I feel I really know about Centrino. Thanks

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now