Test Setup

Professional testing requires the emulation of real-world situations but with repeatable results; thus, a perfectly controllable test setup and environment are required, especially for comparable results. Testing the thermal performance of any case with a typical real-world setup technically limits the comparability of the results to this setup alone, as an active system interacts with its environment and the change of a single component would alter myriads of variables. As such, we developed synthetic loads that emulate the thermal output of real systems, which however are passive, steady and quantifiable. As such, the thermal testing now displays the thermal capabilities of the case alone, as if it would have to deal with the entire thermal load by itself, regardless of the system that would be installed inside it. Laboratory data loggers are being used to monitor the PT100 sensors and control the safety relays, which are fully accessible via our custom software. The Mini-ITX version simulates a 150 W CPU, 30 W VRM, 20 W RAM and 1 × 120 W GPU card thermal load. For low-profile card setups, we are using a 50 W dummy GPU card instead. Finally, 2.5" HDD dummy loads have also been created, converting 15 W of electrical power to thermal. As such, the thermal load can be very high and only the best of cases will be able to handle it for more than a few minutes.

For the full power test, we are using the aforementioned configuration with the full-size 120W card, plus two 2.5" loads. The low load test reduces the main system's power output down to about 42% (132 Watts total), but the disk loads remain unchanged.

Noise testing has been performed with a background noise level of 30.4dB(A). Advanced noise testing is also being performed, in order to assess the ability of the case to dampen the noise of the components installed inside it. This includes the installation of two noise-generating sources (strong fans) inside the case, one positioned approximately over the first expansion slot and one over the CPU area, which can generate ≈ 44.2 dB(A) when unobstructed. During the advanced noise test, all stock cooling options of the case are entirely disabled.

Results & Discussion

As expected from a Mini-ITX case of such proportions and three large stock cooling fans, the thermal performance of the Manta is outstanding. It can easily handle a very large thermal load, greatly outperforming smaller cases like the Cougar QBX, even though their core design is similar. Even without altering its stock cooling options and with a mainstream CPU cooler, the NZXT Manta should have no issues keeping a top tier gaming system cool enough.

The three stock cooling fans of the Manta offer sufficient airflow at relatively low noise levels. With the fans running at their maximum speed, our instrumentation recorded 38.1 dB(A) from one meter away in an environment with a background noise level of 30.4 dB(A). This is the equivalent of an audible but not bothersome humming noise, which is mostly coming from the air getting pulled in from the dense front intake mesh. At lower speeds, the stock cooling fans are virtually inaudible.

Despite the lack of “active” noise reduction measures, such as the installation of sound dampening material, the NZXT Manta has very good noise dampening capabilities. The lack of direct openings/vents at the front or top of the case significantly reduces the noise of the installed system. Our instrumentation measured a drop of 3.2 dB(A) during our advanced testing, which corresponds to a sound pressure reduction greater than 50%, a clearly discernible figure.

The Interior of the NZXT Manta Final Words & Conclusion
Comments Locked

48 Comments

View All Comments

  • jimjamjamie - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    Does it have a valve so that you can deflate it?
  • DanNeely - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    It's a feature. It's screwed up lines mean that even a reviewer who doesn't know how to take good product photos will have all of their flaws hidden by the WTFs in the case design itself.
  • damianrobertjones - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    +1
    The photos, for this article, are terrible.
  • HideOut - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    But the case looks like a mini pregnant guppy.
  • ddriver - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    It looks like it was already used, and the system in it suffered a terrible meltdown.
  • fanofanand - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    I thought they were fine. This is a tech site not a photography site.
  • BrokenCrayons - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    Photos were adequate for getting the point across. I'd prefer the reviewers put more of their limited time into reviewing a product and writing about it as opposed to setting up glam shots for hardware.
  • Murloc - Thursday, June 16, 2016 - link

    yeah companies create enough of those.

    Plus I want to see how the case looks in real life as well, so pics have to be unrefined.
  • deanx0r - Sunday, June 19, 2016 - link

    Except that aesthetics are an essential part of a case. Most people wouldn't even bother with review of cases they find ugly or uninteresting. It isn't hard to take decent photos. The poor photo quality isn't balanced by the outstanding content of the review either. Their case reviews tend to be generic, borderline mediocre. If anything the poor picture quality just shows a lack of effort from the reviewers.
  • BrokenCrayons - Monday, June 20, 2016 - link

    I guess I wouldn't understand. My desktop case sits in a corner, hidden behind a shelf unit. I see it once in a while when I need to press the power button to turn it on. As long as it keeps the parts inside it in the places where I put them and provides enough airflow for cooling, I could care less what it looks like. When I'm playing games on it, I'm streaming them and sitting in different room with my laptop. So for me, the looks of my computer's case is as unimportant as the color of the plastic of my hair dryer.

    Sure, some people are a lot more superficial about what the box looks like which is why there's a market for fashionable cases that have the right sparkles and sunshine in the right places. Those people seeking a certain style are willing to pay for it so from a company perspective, there's no reason not to release a product in order to reap in larger per-unit margins.

    However, taking pics for a review? Whatever. Throw it on your kitchen table, shoot a few photos of it. I don't even care if there's a few dishes loitering in your drying rack in the background. You guys are too picky and its a good thing that most of your spouses, girlfriends, and boyfriends aren't doing that in a more important context than a review of some silly computer case otherwise all those rashes, gaseous emissions, obesity, and body odors would doom the human race.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now