Apple just announced the iPhone 5C. 4-inch Retina Display, A6 SoC, single piece polycarbonate back, 8MP iSight camera and new front facing FaceTime HD camera with 1.9µm pixels. Internally there's a steel frame that doubles as the antenna structure. The 5C is available in 5 colors (blue, white, pink, yellow, green).

The iPhone 5C takes the place of the iPhone 5. Previously Apple would've moved the iPhone 5 down the price chain and replaced it at the high end. The all-metal iPhone 5 likely wouldn't scale well to lower costs, so Apple moved to a polycarbonate design for the 5C. The result is a device with comparable specs to the iPhone 5, but starting at $99.

The iPhone 5C will be available starting on September 20th.

Check out our full coverage of Apple's Town Hall event in our live blog.

Comments Locked

16 Comments

View All Comments

  • kwrzesien - Tuesday, September 10, 2013 - link

    Disappointed that the 32GB model isn't $149.
  • Mumrik - Tuesday, September 10, 2013 - link

    "The result is a device with comparable specs to the iPhone 5, but starting at $99."

    With contract. I know most people know it, but it really really should be pointed out that this thing absolutely doesn't cost $99.
  • lowlymarine - Tuesday, September 10, 2013 - link

    You know, I was actually kind of interested in this when the rumors started spreading around a $300 off-contract price. Sure, it's still a touch too expensive for what you're getting, but not absurdly so, so it would make a nice device to maybe get into iOS development and keep as a spare phone in case something horrible befalls my Nexus 4. Then the rumors went up to $400 or so and my interest began to wane, but I decided to keep an eye on it anyway.

    And then they went and announced it at $550. I'm struggling to find the words to express how outrageous that is. Suffice it to say, you'd have to be absolutely insane to pay that much for a plastic iPhone 5 when the 16GB Nexus 4 is available for $249 with superior internals and arguably better build quality. And if LTE and a better camera mean enough to you for the difference to be worth it...I mean, the One GPe is only $50 more than this! Think about that for a second.
  • steven75 - Tuesday, September 10, 2013 - link

    Superior internals to the 5/5C? It has a far worse camera, far worse GPU, no LTE, etc.
  • lowlymarine - Tuesday, September 10, 2013 - link

    While I have to grant you the camera and LTE (though I have to say that coming from a Lumia 900 that had LTE to a Nexus 4 without it, I've never noticed the difference - it might matter more on a network like VZW or Sprint where 3G is laughably slow, but the difference between Cat14 HSPA+ and LTE isn't perceptible in most situations you'd want to use a capped data plan for anyway), I don't know where you get the idea that Adreno 320 is "far worse" than SGX543 MP3. Anandtech;s own benchmarks (http://www.anandtech.com/show/7251/lg-g2-and-msm89... show the various A320 devices, including the Nexus 4, matching or exceeding the iPhone 5 in T-Rex, Egypt, and Basemark both on- (where the iPhone's lower resolution should give it a leg up) and off-screen. The GLBenchmark synthetics have always produced very odd results on ImgTech GPUs that aren't reflected elsewhere.
  • lowlymarine - Tuesday, September 10, 2013 - link

    So the comment mangled my link, should have been: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7251/lg-g2-and-msm89...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now