Metro2033

Our first analysis is with the perennial reviewers’ favorite, Metro2033.  It occurs in a lot of reviews for a couple of reasons – it has a very easy to use benchmark GUI that anyone can use, and it is often very GPU limited, at least in single GPU mode.  Metro2033 is a strenuous DX11 benchmark that can challenge most systems that try to run it at any high-end settings.  Developed by 4A Games and released in March 2010, we use the inbuilt DirectX 11 Frontline benchmark to test the hardware at 1440p with full graphical settings.  Results are given as the average frame rate from a second batch of 4 runs, as Metro has a tendency to inflate the scores for the first batch by up to 5%.

Metro 2033 - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Metro 2033 - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

Dirt 3

Dirt 3 is a rallying video game and the third in the Dirt series of the Colin McRae Rally series, developed and published by Codemasters.  Dirt 3 also falls under the list of ‘games with a handy benchmark mode’.  In previous testing, Dirt 3 has always seemed to love cores, memory, GPUs, PCIe lane bandwidth, everything.  The small issue with Dirt 3 is that depending on the benchmark mode tested, the benchmark launcher is not indicative of game play per se, citing numbers higher than actually observed.  Despite this, the benchmark mode also includes an element of uncertainty, by actually driving a race, rather than a predetermined sequence of events such as Metro 2033.  This in essence should make the benchmark more variable, but we take repeated in order to smooth this out.  Using the benchmark mode, Dirt 3 is run at 1440p with Ultra graphical settings.  Results are reported as the average frame rate across four runs.

Dirt 3 - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Dirt 3 - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

Civilization V

A game that has plagued my testing over the past twelve months is Civilization V.  Being on the older 12.3 Catalyst drivers were somewhat of a nightmare, giving no scaling, and as a result I dropped it from my test suite after only a couple of reviews.  With the later drivers used for this review, the situation has improved but only slightly, as you will see below.  Civilization V seems to run into a scaling bottleneck very early on, and any additional GPU allocation only causes worse performance.

Our Civilization V testing uses Ryan’s GPU benchmark test all wrapped up in a neat batch file.  We report the average frame rate of a 5 minute test.

Civilization V - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Civilization V - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

Sleeping Dogs

While not necessarily a game on everybody’s lips, Sleeping Dogs is a strenuous game with a pretty hardcore benchmark that scales well with additional GPU power due to its SSAA implementation.  The team over at Adrenaline.com.br is supreme for making an easy to use benchmark GUI, allowing a numpty like me to charge ahead with a set of four 1440p runs with maximum graphical settings.

Sleeping Dogs - One 7970, 1440p, Max Settings

Sleeping Dogs - One 580, 1440p, Max Settings

GPU Conclusions

Despite the computational discrepancies we have seen on the Z87I, the gaming benchmarks perform well – very few of our benchmarks show much difference when dealing with a single discrete GPU at 1440p.  The only ‘low’ result is perhaps Sleeping Dogs using a 7970, although the difference between 27.60 FPS and 28.10 FPS will not be noticeable.

Computation Benchmarks MSI Z87I Conclusion
Comments Locked

46 Comments

View All Comments

  • Schmov17 - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    Do the dual NICs support teaming?
  • bobbozzo - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    If you want gbps or higher performance, you shouldn't be using Realtek NICs; it's almost impossible to get full gbps speed out of them.
    Intel, Broadcom, and possibly Qualcomm Atheros are currently the best choices, and the server-model NICs have more virtualization / offloading capabilities than the standard embedded or desktop models.
  • TheButton - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    I know beggars can't be choosers but I'd love to see a review of the B75(IvyBridge) or B85 (Haswell) mITX motherboards. They are cheap (can be had for <$100) and seem to have all the right features, USB3.0, PCI-E 3.0x16, SATA 6Gbps, 2 Dimm slots. I know they are marketed for small business but they seem ideal for small form-factor gaming machines and I'd love to see how B85 compares versus H81 and/or Z87 especially in the mITX form factor.

    Can we expect any such reviews to be forthcoming Ian?
  • DMisner - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    Just curious if under 'Visual Inspection' you could add a picture of the back of the motherboard. I know sometimes motherboard manufacturers place some small parts on the back and often they get in the way of aftermarket cooler back-plates (especially on m-ITX motherboards) which can be a frustrating surprise to find upon delivery.
  • Razorbak86 - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    For this particular motherboard, check Newegg product #4 (out of 5).
  • Razorbak86 - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    ... Newegg product photo #4 (out of 5)
  • Ammaross - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    "ALC892 audio solution which performed average in our audio tests. If MSI were aiming more at a HTPC or gaming market, we might have seen an ALC898"

    Wouldn't most gamers be utilizing a USB-audio headset?
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    One of the reasons I wouldn't want to ever share an apartment is that I can game on speakers; and no one can tell me otherwise.
  • LordHaHa - Tuesday, August 27, 2013 - link

    Was there any investigation into undervolting the system? The OC results are positive, but I'd rather use mATX+ for higher performance purposes. On the other hand, I could think of some applications for a low-footprint, low-power, no-to-little-default-performance-sacrifice mITX system.
  • londiste - Wednesday, August 28, 2013 - link

    that's what i think when i see any mitx review...
    additionally, why not give power consumption a go with 35/45w tdp cpu and minimal needed hardware attached. for example 4670t, 1 stick of ram and 1 hdd/ssd, omitting a dedicated gpu entirely? i have several mitx boxes running off picopsu (or similar prebuilt solutions from case manufacturers).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now