Acer Ferrari One: General Performance

The Ferrari One starts with a roar, literally. The familiar Windows 7 boot noise has been replaced with a high RPM flyby of a Ferrari Formula 1 car. The performance is far from invoking anything about Ferrari. We'll highlight the single-core and dual-core CULV competition in gold, with Atom in green. Pay attention to the HP Mini 311 as well, which is Atom + ION.

Futuremark PCMark Vantage

Futuremark PCMark05

Internet Performance

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

Video Encoding - x264

Video Encoding - x264

Futuremark puts the Ferrari One just ahead of my single-core AS1410 (CULV SU3500 + GMA 4500MHD) and at times behind the Asus Eee 1201N (i.e. PCMark05), which has ION paired with a dual-core Atom processor. The encoding tests support the theory that the Ferrari One’s Athlon X2 L310 has just about the same amount of raw computing power as the dual-core Atom 330. Cinebench and Peacekeeper say that the L310 isn’t close to the dual-core CULV machines and falls pretty much square in between them and the Atom N450 systems. Overall performance feels faster than Atom 330, but it's a clear step down from the CULV laptops.

In and Around the Acer Ferrari One Acer Ferrari One: Gaming and Graphics
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • marraco - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    Mock iZombies here:
    "My fruit is more expensive because is Ferrari, and your PC is a bug"
  • Edgar_Wibeau - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    Previous year's product, previous year's platform.

    Why don't you review one of the _current_ AMD mobile thin-and-light platform based notebooks? Like eg. from Acer the Aspire 1551 (not on sale in the EU yet, but preorder)? Or the ones maniac5999 posted?

    Here's a roadmap from 10/2009:

    Ferrari One is "Congo" based (the roadmap uses the funny name "2nd Gen UT" ), current is the "Nile" platform, introduced in May 2010.

    The current platform is based on the 45nm Athlon IIs and Turion IIs which have higher clock at same TDP, higher performance per clock and lower wattage when idle, because they are K10.5 based, not K8 like the Ferrari One's. And their graphics (Radeon HD 4225) are R700 based, not the aging RS780 which is on the level of what? R600? R500? Either way, one or two generations behind.

    You could even have chosen a Ferrari One model with 2G or 4G of ram, so it ran 128bit wide. Can't even buy a 3G ram model in Europe, doesn't make sense anyway.

    I call this a biased review.
  • maniac5999 - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    To be fair, there is only ONE Nile notebook on Newegg, and it's 13.3", not exactly netbook size, like the 12" ones I listed. Also, the 42xx is RV620 instead of RV610 for the 3200. The difference? Dx 10.1 and UVD2, which doesn't make a difference to most people. Also, the 4225 is clocked lower than the 3200, 4200 and 4250, which all have the same 40 shaders running at 500mhz.

    Unfortunately, for all these reasons the only big difference between Congo and Nile looks like it's going to be in battery life. (which is much needed btw) There will be an IPC bump going from Athlon (K8) to Athlon II (K10.5), as well, judging from the benches, depending on the application it could be anywhere from 0-30%,which is nice as well, but if it's combined with a lesser IGP like the 4225, would ruin it's use as a nice little portable time waster.
  • Edgar_Wibeau - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    Your're probably right, maniac5999

    (Looks like our last two posts were about the same time)

    What bugs me most is that Anand's review the Ferrari One now instead of seven months ago, when it was released. The timing of this review at least smells a bit, wait a month and post reviews of Nile based AMD note/netbooks.

    Also, AnandTech (and DailyTech) are the only sites I know that didn't write about AMDs Computex 2010 Fusion demos, at least I didn't see any RSS headlines.

    Oh, and Athlon (and Turion) II X2 feature 2x "MByte L2 cache vs. half of that for their predecessors.

    To add some infos:
    Athlon 64 X2 L310: 1.2 GHz, 13W TDP
    Athlon II X2 K325: 1.3 GHz, 12W TDP
    The identical Turion II X2s K625 and K665 run with 1.5 and 1.7 GHz respectively, on a 15W TDP.

    Of cause AMDs 2010 mobile offerings don't shine, but they're better than 2009's of course. 2011 will be a lot more interesting on the AMD side because of the two upcoming fusion designs, assumingly both of which (Ontario high end and Llano low end) touching the upper netbook / cheap thin-and-light "CULV" segment.
  • JarredWalton - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    FWIW, we received several AMD-based notebooks (including the Ferrari One) in late March. AMD sent them to us direct, as the OEMs just aren't interested in seeding reviewers as far as I can see. As noted in the conclusion, there are 45nm parts that look a lot more interesting, though given my testing of the Turion II M600 it won't make a massive difference in battery life. Also note that we're comparing the AMD "Congo" to the Intel "CULV"; the new competition is going to be "Nile" vs. Arrandale ULV. But in the end, we review what we get.

    Stay tuned for more laptop reviews this week....
  • Edgar_Wibeau - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    Ok, thanks!

    One point: in the graphs, I'd find it more informative if only machines were shown that are a bit more similar to the tested one. In many graphs the cheap-and-thin-and-light-class just vanishes because there are machines many times more powerful listed. In some, the numbers of the reviewed machine (and similar ones) are simply not readable, because the bars they are printed on are so short.
  • VivekGowri - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    We didn't choose it specifically, we reviewed what AMD gave us (because it doesn't seem like any of the manufacturers want to give us any AMD based systems). AMD apparently thought the Ferrari One was a good representation of their current mobile platform? Otherwise I don't see why they would have sent it to us.

    For the record, I did rerun some benches with dual channel 2x 2GB memory, and got insignificant differences in regular benchmarks and right around 1-2fps difference in most games. While that helps, it doesn't make anything really playable - whether you get 10.6 or 11.6 fps in Crysis, it's still a slideshow either way.
  • Edgar_Wibeau - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    looks like I was wrong regarding Ferrari One's graphics, sorry. Same generation as current ist seems.
  • T2k - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    Ferrari One confirmed to be working with Fujitsu's older XGP unit:
  • T2k - Tuesday, June 8, 2010 - link

    Prices can be found here:

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now