Asus Eee PC 1001P: Performance Tests

As a preface to the performance benchmarks of the Eee 1001P, let me say this: Atom is still dead slow. The transition from Diamondville/XP to Pineview/Win7 Starter is essentially a wash, since you combine a marginally faster processor in Pineview with a heavier and thus slower operating system in Win7. Honestly, I would rather have XP on a netbook—any netbook. Win7 Starter is annoying and unsightly when compared to the "full" version of Win7 Home Premium and shouldn't exist in any corner of the market with its lack of Aero and the ridiculousness of a fixed desktop background. The capabilities of netbooks have not changed—you still can't play HD video or HD flash without ION or a Broadcom HD chip, and you can't really do much more than run a word processor and a browser simultaneously.

Futuremark PCMark Vantage

Futuremark PCMark05

Futuremark 3DMark06

Internet Performance

Futuremark 3DMark05

Futuremark 3DMark03

Video Encoding - x264

Video Encoding - x264

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

3D Rendering - CINEBENCH R10

For those of you who noticed that the 1001P's hardware specs are exactly the same as the 1005PE and expected similar benchmarking results, you're spot on. For those of you expecting the first true netbook offering decent performance, feel free to keep waiting. (I exclude the 1201N, since it has the dual-core desktop variant of the original Atom processor. It's an interesting experiment, but not a real netbook in the conventional sense.) The 3DMark results are pretty much level with the 1005PE, while the PCMark tests actually show an increase. The slight differences come mainly from newer, more mature drivers from Intel and potentially a faster hard drive. Regardless, the performance tests are mediocre across the board, which by netbook standards is about par for the course.

If you're still wondering about gaming performance, let's try to put things in perspective. The GMA 4500MHD found in current CULV designs is wholly inadequate for anything more than Spore or The Sims 3, and even then you'll need to run at low resolutions with minimum detail. And as bad as the 4500MHD is for gaming, it's two to four times faster than the GMA 3150! That's not even getting into the fact that most games take an eternity to load with Atom and 1GB of RAM. So don't worry about gaming on a Pine Trail netbook and you'll be a lot happier.

Asus Eee PC 1001P: Awesome LCD Asus Eee PC 1001P: Battery Life
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • AnnonymousCoward - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    piroroadkill, I suggest you find out who God is, before throwing out "godawful", "goddamn", or whatever else. Don't forget that God created the physics that allows your computer to work, as well as wireless communication, and the incredible light sensors known as your eyes, and light in general.
  • afkrotch - Thursday, March 18, 2010 - link

    And according to god, I'm allowed to beat my children when they misbehave. I'm also suppose to envision myself eating his flesh and drinking his blood in church.
  • funkyd99 - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    Religion and tech websites don't mix... If someone offends you, ignoring that person is more effective than patronizing them.

    Yours truely,
    An agnostic who is sick of finding religious references in inappropriate places (and a hypocrite for responding to you)
  • legoman666 - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    I have a Dell Mini10 with the GMA500. Buying it was a mistake. Constant BSOD with Aero enabled in Win7, slow as crap, poor drivers. On the plus side, about 9 months after I got it, the drivers finally progressed enough to get HD decoding working somewhat. 720p works OK, 1080p works sometimes.

    I finally said screw it and installed Ubuntu netbook remix. Honestly, my Nokia N900 phone fills the gadget gap better than the Mini10. My next laptop will be bigger, CULV with a ~12" screen and more than 1gb ram.
  • AnnonymousCoward - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    Why can't Microsoft make an OS that's better than XP for netbooks? And you can't even change the background--are you kidding?

    The matte screen is very welcome. Great review.
  • afkrotch - Thursday, March 18, 2010 - link

    I reloaded my netbook with a clean install of WinXP Pro. Can change my desktop all the time.
  • MonkeyPaw - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    Speaking of OSes, I wonder how well it hackintoshes?
  • numberoneoppa - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    Nice review. The battery life would definitely be the selling point for me. 10 hours of web browsing or movie watching sounds mighty fine. Oh, and of course, the screen. I also cannot stand most notebook screens these days. The only company that seems to be able to do a glossy screen properly is Apple, and even still, I prefer matte (<3 Thinkpad).
  • piroroadkill - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    Really? Have a Macbook here and the screen is like a goddamn mirror. I'd say NOBODY can do a glossy screen right
  • samspqr - Wednesday, March 17, 2010 - link

    glossy is bad, always

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now