FIRST LOOK: ULi M1695 PCIe/AGP Socket 939 for Athlon 64
by Wesley Fink on July 13, 2005 12:05 AM EST- Posted in
- Motherboards
Overclocking: ULi M1695/M1567
| Front Side Bus Overclocking Testbed | |
| Default Voltage | |
| Processor: | Athlon 64 4000+ (2.4GHz, 1MB Cache) |
| CPU Voltage: | 1.50V (default 1.50V) |
| Cooling: | Thermaltake Silent Boost K8 Heatsink/Fan |
| Power Supply: | OCZ Power Stream 520W |
| Memory: | OCZ PC3200 EL Platinum Rev. 2 (Samsung TCCD Memory Chips) |
| Hard Drive: | Seagate 120GB 7200RPM SATA 8MB Cache |
| Maximum OC: (Standard Ratio) |
235x12 (4x HT, 2.5-3-3-10) 2820MHz (+17.5%) |
| Maximum FSB: (Lower Ratio) |
300 x 9 (2700MHz) (3x HT) 2 DIMMs in DC mode (+50% Bus Overclock) |
Since there were no voltages for memory, we had to toss our normal overclock procedures out the window to bring you a better idea of the overclocking capabilities of this board. We have seen reports that this new ULi Reference Board, or more specifically the sister Reference Board with the dual 8X riser slot, can reach a CPU Speed setting of 400. Without memory voltage, the only way that this can be tested is by lowering memory ratios to those that can run at default voltage. In other words, we were only measuring the overclock capabilities - an important consideration, since this is a new chipset.
While we could not reach a CPU base speed of 400, we were able to run 300, which is very comparable to results with the NVIDIA nForce4. We also reached an overclock of 235 with our default 12X multiplier. Both these results are competitive with NVIDIA, and they are both outstanding, considering that they were achieved with no memory voltage control. Perhaps the latest version of the M1695 Reference can indeed reach a speed setting of 400. We have asked ULi for a Reference Board with dual x8 riser and we will bring you the test as soon as the board becomes available.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
72 Comments
View All Comments
val - Friday, July 15, 2005 - link
#47 mino, you are pushing arguments which have nothing to do with real world. UV radiation in that level makes no harm, do not forget to hide your self on the sun. AMD fanboys started to talk about heating and all this crap, 100W bulb heats your room with 86W you wise guy.And energy efficienty? Close to here is powerplant for military research which have dedicated 2x400MNW power plant. So who cares? This is 10.000.000 PCs which is amount of families here and caring for that no PC runs 100% load all the time.
Costs? I dont know about you, but i am just out of school and even when it would be 200 euro per year difference, I CANNOT SEE THAT! And again! Show me somebody who have gaming PC running games 24/7.
So caring for energy and heat more than for stability and reliability is just finding nonsense weakpoint of platform YOU dont LIKE because you just want to be different and saying that popular "MAINSTREAM BS".
So calm down fanboys, AMD will never get market share their owners dreams they deserves.
PhoneZ - Friday, July 15, 2005 - link
I would almost never run a system without the chipset drivers. a VIA system could go down at any random point without the 4in1s, you need the Intel INF Updae to install the SMBus, and Windows doesnt have drivers for any of the nForce chipset hardware. Bbut I will admit that i won't install the SIS IDE cause that can cause system to becoe unstable. nForce can be very stable but has alot of bugs that can destroy yer OS if you dont disable certain features(ie firewall).nserra - Friday, July 15, 2005 - link
All platforms are good, but i admit the drivers suck. Keep the default OS ones and all runs good.I have the default XP drivers on my SIS board and all runs stable and fast.
This new Uli is looking good, specialy for my 9700 card.
My ex nforce2 took 1 year and half to get stable, and to get the sound card working right.
Cygni - Friday, July 15, 2005 - link
Wtf, Nforce is unstable? Wow. Could have fooled me... havent rebooted for a few weeks.Honestly, the Intel vs AMD fanboy attacks are hillarious, because both know approximatly nothing.
Both platforms are rock solid, period. Stability isnt even a legitimate argument anymore.
Xenoterranos - Thursday, July 14, 2005 - link
Hey, now I can update to skt 939!mino - Thursday, July 14, 2005 - link
#34;#44;#45 You're an idiot. No appologies.If Intel system uses 180W idle and AMD system 100W idle, it is NOT 20W difference.
And about your "energy efficient bulb" You forgot to mention that these bulbs emit UV radiation unlike traditional edison-style bulbs. So the light You get from them is NOT the light you get from traditional ones. In PC world, however the performance of A64 and P4 is interchangeable.
I don't believe You will get it.
But someone had to try...
mino - Thursday, July 14, 2005 - link
#27 Don't insult Uli, we have yet to see good driver support from NVIDIA. VIA,SIS,Intel is the league Uli is playing in as far as driver support is concerned. ATI/nVidia have ONLY performance and ATI has good integrated graphics givers.val - Thursday, July 14, 2005 - link
#37 my prescott is not throttling, i can install cooler correct." Anand said he had no problems at all with his reference board" they are testing it few hours at most, this is not prooven platform. nForce is still being good rated in newspapers, and look how crappy it is. Not talking about VIA.
"You must save tons of money on your electric bill in the winter." No, 20W makes no difference either for electric bill or warm in room. Go back to school. 70W i save by changing my bulb from 100W to energy efficient 20W one.
val - Thursday, July 14, 2005 - link
#38 maybe you should next time give somebody 50$ to build and install computer for you if you are so LAME that you cannot build stable pc. And you believe me, that i didnt expected any other claim from AMD fanboy, and i know that you would say this even when it is not truth.stmok - Thursday, July 14, 2005 - link
Forgot to add...The ASRock mobo is estimated to come at end of July! (Assuming no delays).