Massive ISP Upgrades

I’ve been hearing for some time now that 2022 flagships will have massive camera upgrades, and the new features of the next-gen SoCs being described by MediaTek and now also Qualcomm explain why that is.

The new ISP of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 falls under a new marketing name – “Snapdragon Sight”, and includes large improvements of the capabilities of the IP blocks within the image processing chain.

The big flagship feature being advertised is the fact that the new ISP is now capable of 18-bits of color depth per channel, up from the previous generation 14-bit ISP. While mobile image sensors nowadays still are barely 12-bit native in terms of their ADCs, the ushering of new HDR techniques such as staggered HDR capture, where exposures are immediately subsequent to each other on the sensor’s readout, means that new phones now are able to capture images a lot faster, recombining them into higher bit-depth results. Particularly here, the new 18-bit ISP pipeline now allows for three exposure HDR stacking off these new sensors.

The increased bit-depth should allow for an increase of 4 stops in dynamic range (or 2^4 = 16x the range), which greatly helps with very contrasting environments and challenging lighting situations. This is quite beyond any other camera solution right now, and being able to have this implemented in such a hardware fashion sort of blurs the line between traditional image capture techniques and the more software-defined computational photography methods of the last few years.

Indeed, the new ISP architecture seems to be very much a way to implement many of the existing computational photography techniques into fixed-function blocks: there’s a new neural-net controlled 3AA (auto-exposure, auto-focus, auto-white-balance) and face detection block, which sounds eerily similar to Google’s HDRnet implementations.

Night mode is also said to be vastly improved through a new multi-frame noise reduction and image stacking block, being able to now stack and align up to 30 images, and achieve also much finer detail this generation. Qualcomm here claims up to 5x better night mode shots.

Further improvements include a new distortion correction block that’s able to now also correct for chromatic aberrations, and a hardware video Bokeh engine, being able to operate at up to 4K video recording. Think of it as the same as the new Cinematic mode on the new A15 iPhones, but not only limited to 1080p.

Qualcomm notes that all the AI/ML/neural network features on the ISP are actually run and accelerated on the ISP itself, meaning that it is not offloaded onto the Hexagon dedicated ML processing blocks or the GPU.

Just as a note- Qualcomm’s 3.2Gigapixel/s throughput metric here seems low compared to the Dimensity 9000’s 9Gpixel/s, it’s possible that the companies are advertising very different metrics, with MediaTek advertising the throughput of lower-bit depth pixels coming from the image sensors per frame, while Qualcomm quoting the full bit depth pixel processing within the ISP itself.

In terms of video encoders and decoders, the new chip allows for 8K HDR recording now, but otherwise is seemingly on par with the Snapdragon 888 media blocks. Unfortunately, this also means no AV1 decoding this year yet again. Qualcomm isn’t part of the Alliance for Open Media consortium and instead is backing VVC/H.266 and EVC, however with AV1 being actively pushed by Google and YouTube, and seeing large adoptions such as by Netflix, it’s becoming questionable for Qualcomm to still not support the format in 2022 devices.

AI Performance - Iterative, but solid

Last year’s Hexagon IP block was a very large change for the Snapdragon 888. At the time, Qualcomm moved on from a more segregated DSP/AI architecture to a single more fused-together block being able to operate on scalar, vector, and tensor operations at the same time. This year’s iteration is an improvement of that larger change. Qualcomm notes that amongst many changes, they’ve doubled up on the shared memory of the block, allowing for greater performance for larger ML models (which are growing at a very fast pace).

Qualcomm didn’t note any TOPS figures this time around, instead stating we’re seeing 2x the tensor throughput performance, and smaller increases for scalar and vector processing. They do quote a day-1 to day-1 performance increase of 4x when compared to the Snapdragon 888, via a combination of both hardware and software improvements, but of course that figure is smaller when comparing both platforms on an equal software footing.

Power efficiency for AI workloads is said to be 70% better this generation, which is actually more significant, and should help with more demanding sustained ML workloads.

X65 Modem Integrated

In terms of connectivity, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is quite straightforward, as it integrates the X65 modem IP that Qualcomm had already announced as a discrete model earlier this year.

The improvements here are the fact that it’s a 3GPP Release 16 compatible modem, including new features such as uplink carrier aggregation. Other improvements are 300MHz of Sub-6 bandwidth on 3 100MHz carriers, and an increase of the mmWave bandwidth from 800 MHz to 1000MHz, allowing a new peak theoretical downlink speeds of 10Gbps.

Introduction & Specifications - CPU & GPU Conclusion & First Impressions
POST A COMMENT

219 Comments

View All Comments

  • mode_13h - Thursday, December 2, 2021 - link

    I thought I wanted a headphone jack, but I haven't even been using it in my phone of the past 3 years. It turns out that I value noise cancellation much more, and most of those headphones are bluetooth. Even ones that aren't still have an ADC + DAC, rendering it almost pointless to use a cord vs. Bluetooth with AptX HD or LDAC. Reply
  • TheinsanegamerN - Monday, December 6, 2021 - link

    My 30 year old truck didnt magically develop bluetooth, neither did my 15 year old car, my home stereo steup, my speakers in my kitchen, ece. Until they do, keep that headphone jack around! Reply
  • mode_13h - Tuesday, December 7, 2021 - link

    Point taken. However, if you one day fancy a phone without a headphone jack, I'm sure you can get Bluetooth receivers for your car and elsewhere. Just sayin'. Reply
  • Oxford Guy - Monday, December 13, 2021 - link

    The BT audio codecs I have encountered have also been clearly audibly inferior to Red Book which is slightly audibly inferior to 20-bit 48K audio (basically the limit of human hearing resolution).

    The ‘loudness war’ and mp3/aac have done their best to ruin sound quality but some of us still care. Analog headphone jacks are hardly ideal but they’re better than BT.
    Reply
  • mode_13h - Monday, December 13, 2021 - link

    Suit yourself, but I've been satisfied with AptX HD, on my Sennheisers, and LDAC, on my Sony headphones (high-quality setting). Of course, you'll want to be sure your phone has good support for these, but I think Sony provides the LDAC encoder, royalty-free. Qualcomm owns AptX, but I'm guessing they charge extra for HD, because not all phones support that version.

    Unless you're in a perfectly quiet environment, it's hard to appreciate the benefits of a fully-lossless signal path. You might find that anything you give up by using one of the better BT codecs, you make up for by lowering the noise floor via noise-canceling. I've used sealed, corded ear buds, but the cord noise bugs me too much and they're not comfortable to leave in for as long.
    Reply
  • Oxford Guy - Tuesday, December 14, 2021 - link

    The proliferation of BT audio standards also feeds the point about long-term compatibility.

    Corporations love the subscription model ‘must rent everything’ paradigm but not everyone is yet indoctrinated suitably.
    Reply
  • mode_13h - Friday, December 17, 2021 - link

    > The proliferation of BT audio standards

    I'm not sure AptX and LDAC actually *are* standards. AFAIK, they're strictly proprietary. That's another whole discussion, in itself.
    Reply
  • Tams80 - Tuesday, December 14, 2021 - link

    Umm, that's great for you, but no one asked you to try and convince us that we don't want a headphone jack. Reply
  • vladx - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    "This admission was actually a breath of fresh air and insight into the situation, as it’s been something I’ve especially noted in our Kirin 9000, Snapdragon 888 and Exynos 2100 and Tensor deep-dives in criticizing all the new chips. "

    Why are you lying here, Andrei? Neither you or any other AnandTech writer has made a deep-dive of the Kirin 9000. Writing such useless lies in your last AnandTech article is downright pathetic.
    Reply
  • casteve - Wednesday, December 1, 2021 - link

    This 18-bit ISP business seems like marketing BS. Consumer cameras with much larger pixels can maybe approach 12-bit dynamic range. I'd expect cell phone cameras to be closer to 10-bit at best. Sure, you can have fun with HDR stacking to average out noise...but 8-bits worth? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now