During a time of increased competitor activity, Intel has decided to disclose some of the high level details surrounding its next generation consumer processor, known as Rocket Lake or Intel’s 11th Gen Core. The new processor family is due in the market in the first quarter of 2021, and is expected to share a socket and motherboard compatibility with the current 10th Gen Comet Lake processors, providing an upgrade path even for those with a Core i9-10900K, Intel’s highest performing desktop processor to date. New 500-series motherboards are also expected to be available.

The new Rocket Lake-S silicon or SoC is going to be known as ‘Cypress Cove’. Intel confuses itself in the press release compared to the PDF presentation, as the press release dictates that this isn’t the core – it specifically states that the core microarchitecture is Ice Lake (Sunny Cove). However the presentation PDF says Cypress Cove is the core. In this instance, to be clear, Sunny Cove and Cypress Cove are set to be practically identical, however Sunny Cove is on 10nm and Cypress Cove is the back-ported variant on 14nm.

Paired with these cores will be the Tiger Lake graphics architecture, known as Xe-LP, which is also being backported from 10nm to 14nm for this product. The combined 14nm representation of Ice Lake cores and Xe-LP graphics is what is going to be known as Rocket Lake, (at least one of) the SoC(s) of the 11th Gen Core family.

With the new processors, Intel is targeting a raw instruction-per-clock uplift in the double digit range, which would be similar to the uplift we saw moving from Comet Lake to Intel’s Ice Lake mobile processors. Because of the node difference, the exact IPC change is likely to be lower than what we’ve seen before, but 10%+ is still highly respectable, especially if Intel is also able to maintain the high frequency it has achieved with the current generation of Comet Lake.

One of the benefits of moving to a back-ported Sunny Cove core will be the inclusion of the AVX-512 vector acceleration unit in Cypress Cove. This enables Intel to enable its library of Deep Learning Boost technologies for AI and ML acceleration, including support for Vector Neural Network Instructions (VNNI), finally bringing AVX-512 to the desktop platform.

However, to mix and match the right combination of core count, graphics, and AVX-512 for die size/yield/cost, it appears that Rocket Lake-S will only offer a maximum of eight cores in its largest configuration. Within the press release PDF, Intel stated that the current silicon as tested is rated for 125 W TDP, with a top turbo boost of 250 W, which matches what we see on the Core i9-10900K already. There’s no escaping the performance-per-watt characteristics of the process node, which indicates that Intel might find hitting those high frequencies a little easier with fewer cores to deal with. Intel is also promoting new overclocking tools with Rocket Lake, however did not go into details.

Another feature that Intel has disclosed with Rocket Lake is the move to PCIe Gen 4.0 on the processor, with up to 20 lanes available. These are likely to be split into one x16 for graphics and one x4 for storage on most motherboards, and this aligns with what we’ve seen on the latest generation of Intel Z490 motherboards, some of which have already promoted support for PCIe 4.0 ‘on future Intel processors’. This means Rocket Lake. Intel also mentions that the memory controller now supports up to DDR4-3200, however the projected performance numbers were done with DDR4-2933 memory.

On the graphics side, moving to the Xe-LP graphics architecture is going to be a big uplift in graphics performance, with Intel suggesting a 50% improvement over current Comet Lake integrated graphics. It is worth noting here in the slide that Intel mentions ‘UHD Graphics ft Xe Graphics Architecture’ – this would perhaps point to a scaled down version of Xe compared to Tiger Lake. I’m fully expecting to see only 32 EUs here, as a balance between die area, power, and performance. In the fine print it suggests that there will be some versions of Rocket Lake without the integrated graphics enabled, similar to the F processors we see on the market today.

That being said, for those units with integrated graphics, Intel is promoting new media encoders and display resolution support, with up to 4K60 12-bit for 4:4:4 HEVC and VP9, or up to 4K60 with 10-bit 4:2:0 AV1, showcasing AV1 support for mainstream processors. Display resolution support has also increased, with up to three 4K60 displays or two 5K60 displays, supporting DP 1.4a (with HBR3) and HDMI 2.0b.

This was an unexpected news announcement this morning - speaking to peers it all seems to be a bit of a surprise - perhaps even for the PR teams, given that the system configurations as 'projected' in the slide above is dated 6th August, almost 3 months ago. It will be interesting to hear if Intel will disclose more details ahead of launch.

Source: Intel

Related Reading

 

 

 

POST A COMMENT

188 Comments

View All Comments

  • Santoval - Friday, October 30, 2020 - link

    edit : Above I meant "I expect the same will apply to AMD's *next-gen* APUs". Since AMD's Zen 3 based Cezanne APUs will retain a Vega GPU block it is doubtful they will support AV1 decode acceleration or any new decode or encode acceleration at all. Unless of course AMD realize their folly and scrap their bizarre plans for distinct (and both unequal) Cezanne and Van Gogh APUs and simply pair Zen 3 with a Navi 2 GPU block. That's very doubtful. Reply
  • GeoffreyA - Saturday, October 31, 2020 - link

    Agreed, SVT-AV1's quality is deplorable. Rav1e is also available but I haven't tried it and can't comment. Same with others, like Cisco's.

    You know, when I first heard about AV1, I grew quite excited. Felt the beating of my heart: a new royalty-free video codec, battling it out with HEVC. Marvellous! Good riddance to HEVC! But I was quickly disappointed. AV1 only has marginal gains over HEVC, and owing to its speed, isn't practical to use. From anecdotal testing one afternoon, using libaom in FFmpeg, I found that its picture quality looked lovely, superior to HEVC, but noticeably soft (the source, Mulholland Drive, had a slight bit of grain). I admit, there are likely settings in AV1 that can mend that. Subjective, yes, but softness bugs me.

    Hardware support should make AV1 easy to encode, but then again, such video might end up being beaten by x265.

    Despite the patent rubbish, I am looking forward to VVC/x266 and hope it delivers. Truth is, I dislike HEVC's picture quality and still prefer AVC's (though at lower bitrates the latter loses of course).
    Reply
  • Fergy - Saturday, October 31, 2020 - link

    Benchmarks claim that AV1 is 20% better than H265. On youtube you can't see the difference between H264,VP9 and AV1. Decoding of AV1 on youtube takes max 1.25 zen cores for 60fps full hd.
    The only reason I see to use H265 is if the end device does not have support for VP9 and it HAS to be smaller than H264. The rest of the time VP9 and later AV1 will be the better choice. Every GPU developed after 2019H2 can decode AV1.

    Your comments about quality and speed are time limited. It is a matter of time before AV1 wins at every metric. There are a lot of billion dollar companies wanting a free to use video codec.
    Reply
  • GeoffreyA - Saturday, October 31, 2020 - link

    I hope that AV1 wins, and you are right, its picture does look noticeably better than H.265/HEVC, though a little soft. But the thing is, when x266 comes out, VVC is another variable that will have to be taken into account. And already, if the studies are correct, it shows better compression than both AV1 and HEVC.

    I hope I didn't sound as if I were defending HEVC in the comment from earlier today. In fact, I can't stand its picture and prefer H.264 any day.
    Reply
  • GeoffreyA - Saturday, October 31, 2020 - link

    I agree about the APUs and was myself wishing there'd be a Zen 3 + RDNA2 one for AM4 people.

    As for the video units, it appears that AMD is able to change that, apart from the GPU. Take a look at the die shot of Raven Ridge, and you'll see the multimedia block is seperate; and, according to Wikipedia, Renoir uses VCN 2, whereas Raven R. was using VCN 1. In short, it's possible that Cezanne, while carrying Vega, might use the newer video block, with AV1 decoding.
    Reply
  • Spunjji - Monday, November 2, 2020 - link

    Perfectly possible, and quite likely. Reply
  • Slash3 - Friday, October 30, 2020 - link

    It was an error on their slide. It does not support accelerated AV1 encoding. Reply
  • mdriftmeyer - Friday, October 30, 2020 - link

    Correct. Intel sure as hell won't have AV1 encode on their GPU before Nvidia or AMD

    https://www.amd.com/en/products/specifications/com...
    Reply
  • Santoval - Friday, October 30, 2020 - link

    I see. That makes more sense actually. So no AV1 encoding acceleration from Intel until at least Alder Lake and no such support either from AMD until at least Zen 4 based APUs and Navi 3 graphics cards. Swell... Reply
  • yeeeeman - Friday, October 30, 2020 - link

    While this ain't a bad thing, what intel should have done is to cancel rocket lake entirely and bring alder lake faster Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now