The SilverStone Argon AR07 140 mm CPU Cooler

The SilverStone Argon AR07 is a single tower cooler, with three copper heatpipes transferring the thermal energy from the small base to the large rectangular fin array. It is 163 mm (6.42”) tall, meaning it requires a rather wide case to fit. Although the SilverStone Argon AR07 initially appears to be a simple tower cooler, its design is actually not as straightforward as most people would expect from of product at this price range.

A close inspection of the cooler reveals a complex and uneven “saw tooth” fin cutout. SilverStone calls this the “interweaving diamond edge” pattern and claims that it improves performance, although they do not explain exactly how that is being achieved. The top fin has airflow direction cutouts, meaning that the cooler will perform optimally only if the airflow is directed as the arrows indicate.

Turning the cooler upside down reveals that this is a direct heatpipe contact design, much like the Thermalright True Spirit 140 Direct that we recently reviewed. The core design difference between the two coolers is that the Argon AR07 only has three 8 mm heatpipes, which are not adequate to cover the entire surface of a modern CPU. As such, the designer had to cover the gaps by extending the aluminum frame in between the heatpipes. Even though these will be in contact with the CPU, the aluminum part of the base exists only for the mechanical cohesion of the construct and should play virtually no part on the transfer of thermal energy away from the CPU core.

The 140 mm fan with the blue circular frame and the white blades is one of the highlights of the Argon AR07. The fan’s part ID, APA1425M12, refers to a fan that is being used on various SilverStone products, but we could not identify the OEM behind it. Nevertheless, we identified that it is using an enhanced (sealed) sleeve bearing engine. Although sleeve bearings rarely compete with ball bearings in terms of longevity, SilverStone quite possibly opted for the particular designs due to its much lower noise levels.

 

Once mounted on the cooler, the 140 mm fan covers most of the array’s surface, with the exception of the very bottom part of the array. This was probably intended by the designer in order to allow for a portion of the airflow to be directed towards the motherboard’s components. SilverStone includes a second set of wire holders for another 140 mm fan to be mounted on the other side of the cooler, although that would be quite the overkill for this particular product. Note that the fan should not be installed before the cooler, as it will interfere with the installation process.

Installation

The installation process of the Argon AR07 is straightforward but, due to the size of the cooler, it may be difficult to complete with the motherboard installed inside a case. The first step of the process is to affix the backplate on the motherboard using the four nuts with the threaded stems.

The second step is to install the proper retention frame for your particular CPU onto the base of the cooler using the four provided screws. The AMD AM2/AM3/FM1/FM2 bracket is shown installed in the picture below.

Following the installation of the retention frame and the application of thermal compound on the CPU core, the cooler can be seated on the CPU and the threaded stems should go right through the holes of the retention frame. The cooler is then secured on the CPU by tightening four thumb-driven nuts. This particular step might be a bit difficult to achieve if the motherboard is installed inside a case, as direct hand access to the nuts may be obstructed depending on the position of the CPU socket and the size of the motherboard’s heatsinks.

The final step is the installation of the cooling fan using the retention wires. The installation of the vibration absorption silicon strips is optional but recommended for optimal results. Once installed, the Argon AR07 does take a lot of space, but the fan should stop just shy of the first RAM slot.

Introduction, Packaging & Bundle Testing Methodology
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Rocket321 - Tuesday, June 13, 2017 - link

    @tonyou - thanks!
  • Drumsticks - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link

    Great performance from Silverstone! Size permitting, it looks like this should displace the Hyper 212 as many default recommendations. Thanks for the review, as well.
  • alin - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link

    I would review the Arctic Freezer 13.
    Outstanding cheap cooler. I personaly use it to passive cool a i7 4790. Great. No throttling at all. Checked using intel own XTU.
  • marc1000 - Sunday, June 11, 2017 - link

    nice review and cooler. though I enjoy scythe products a lot, and for smaller case I can only think of Ninja Mini, being only 112mm tall it's the shortest tower cooler I have found.

    I got one used from ebay some 5 years ago and it's still rocking fine a OC i5 2500k to 4.0ghz. not the fastest overclock, neither the coolest temps ever, but on a small case where no other towers would fit, it is cool and silent enough. way better than any compact or standard cooler.

    based on other comments however, I got really interested in Arctive Freezer 13, with only 130mm size and what looks like a way better design. thanks Alin!
  • alchemist83 - Sunday, June 18, 2017 - link

    lol for real? is ugly, has clips and gets nosiy at temp.
  • Samus - Friday, June 9, 2017 - link

    Wow $35? This effectively knocks the EVO212 from the top of the budget list, then.
  • DominionSeraph - Thursday, June 15, 2017 - link

    EVO and the new and improved 212X can be found for $20-25. (X is $20 right now) Their greatness is that it provides all the performance the majority of people need (silent operation at stock or a mild overclock) for the least amount of money. There are several coolers that beat the 212's at the $35 level, but they never fall under $35 and it's not such a big difference that there's any reason for most people to pony up the extra cash.
    Stock fans are loud. The 212 isn't, which is so worth the $20. Above that is only for pushing overclocks.
  • Oxford Guy - Sunday, July 2, 2017 - link

    If someone can build a computer they can afford $10-15 more for a better cooler.
  • yannigr2 - Saturday, June 10, 2017 - link

    I wouldn't call it "budget" or "inexpensive" solution. The last few years, because of AIO watercooling solutions and their relatively high prices, manufacturers found an excuse to increase prices on their air cooling solutions. This cooler wouldn't cost more than 20-25$ a few years back. Coolers that you could buy for $15 a few years ago, now cost over $20.
  • alchemist83 - Sunday, June 18, 2017 - link

    $20? doubt it a bit. Infact I know thats ballz as its been my job to know prices for 15 years now.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now