Quality and Per-Key Actuation Force Testing

In order to test the quality and consistency of a keyboard, we are using a texture analyser that is programmed to measure and display the actuation force of the standard keyboard keys. By measuring the actuation force of every key, the quality and consistency of the keyboard can be quantified. It can also reveal design issues, such as the larger keys being far softer to press than the main keys of the keyboard. The actuation force is measured in Centinewton (cN). Some companies use another figure, gram-force (gf). The conversion formula is 1 cN = 1.02 gf (i.e. they are about the same). A high quality keyboard should be as consistent as possible, with an average actuation force as near to the manufacturer's specs as possible and a disparity of less than ±10%. Greater differences are likely to be perceptible by users. It is worth noting that there is typically variance among keyboards, although most keyboard companies will try and maintain consistency - as with other reviews, we're testing our sample only.

The machine we use for our testing is accurate enough to provide readings with a resolution of 0.1 cN. For wider keys (e.g. Enter, Space Bar, etc.), the measurement is taking place at the center of the key, right above the switch. Note that large keys generally have a lower actuation force even if the actuation point is at the dead center of the key. This is natural, as the size and weight of the keycap reduces the required actuation force. For this reason, we do display the force required to actuate every key but we only use the results of the typical sized keys for our consistency calculations. Still, very low figures on medium sized keys, such as the Shift and Enter keys reveal design issues and can easily be perceptible by the user.

It is good to see that the modifications that Cherry made to create the MX Silent switch did not affect their quality. The Corsair Gaming Strafe RGB Mechanical Gaming Keyboard is exceptionally consistent, with a disparity of just ±3.08%. The Cherry MX Silent switches (MX Red variation) have an actuation force rating of 45 cN and those of our sample averaged at 45.6 cN. The difference of 0.6 cN, or even many times that much, is indiscernible by touch. Samples of models with Cherry switches usually have a disparity of 3 to 5%, therefore the new Cherry MX Silent switches are just as good as the older versions as far as consistency and quality goes.

As for the noise, that is a complicated matter. The noise of a keyboard depends almost exclusively on the user. How fast keys are being pressed, how much force they have when/if they hit the bottom and how fast the finger leaves each key are the basic factors that account for the noise generated during the use of a keyboard. It would be therefore inaccurate to base our entire testing on just a single figure, recorded by a sound pressure level meter for a single keystroke. Using the SPL meter, the peak sound generated by the Strafe RGB with the MX Silent switches, in comparison with the K70 RGB (Cherry MX Red switches), dropped by 4.6 dB(A) while I was trying to type the same sentence. That might not sound like a lot, but it actually is a reduction of over 50% (the dB(A) scale is logarithmic) and clearly perceptible. Were the MX Silent versions of the Cherry MX Red switch entirely silent? Naturally, the answer is no. Although the noise generated by the keystrokes is greatly reduced, some noise is still being generated. However, that noise level is now comparable to membrane and chiclet keys, so it does make the Cherry MX Silent switches "silent" - at least as far as mechanical keyboards go.

The Software: Corsair Utility Engine (CUE) Final Words and Conclusion
Comments Locked

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • wolfemane - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    I can see that as a nice feature. I really do dislike the tiny return keys. My one dislike of the k800 I use now.
  • MamiyaOtaru - Friday, March 25, 2016 - link

    fine except that the backslash key gets displaced somewhere. Typically taking up half of where the backspace key should be. Unacceptable to me, as I am completely used to the full sized backspace key. My favorite old board (pre windows-key days) had backslash between right alt and right command, leaving the double height enter key and full sized backspace and shift keys.
  • bigboxes - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    Don't forget your turbo button.
  • ddriver - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    LOL, it is not THAT old.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    That was on the PC not the keyboard.
  • ddriver - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    There were many keyboards with turbo keys back in the day, there was another line of 3 keys on top of the arrows, under delete end and page down. My keyboard is probably one of the first waves of keyboards who didn't have those and the layout is pretty much identical to keyboards on the market today.
  • bigboxes - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    I know. A joke.
  • kmmatney - Wednesday, March 16, 2016 - link

    I threw out my old DIN-connector IBM keyboard 10 years back. Built like a tank, and clicky as heck - I wish I would have kept it...
  • wolfemane - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    I kinda have to agree. I don't get the mechanical keyboard craze. I bought one last year with the silent MX switches. If by silent they meant wake the whole house at night then yeah they were silent. I used it for about 5 months and replaced it with a k800. Using it felt like I was back in junior high playing in the computer lab. Uncomfortable, large, wired, and obnoxiously loud. I failed to see its relevance and noticed no improvement in typing or benefit in gaming. Maybe I just bought the wrong brand of switches. The noise was ultimately the end all of any interest I had for mechanical keyboards.
  • BrokenCrayons - Tuesday, March 15, 2016 - link

    Modern mechanical keyboards likely offer a much larger percentage markup than membrane keyboards so manufacturers even landing small sales numbers have a pretty big incentive to develop and market them. The styling is designed to attract people who wish to identify themselves as "gamers" and are willing to spend the money necessary to look the part. It doesn't matter at all if there's no functional difference when the aforementioned person pushes the W key to move their character forward on a $10 keyboard or a $200 keyboard. What matters is that person's belief that it makes a difference worth the cost markup. Like many other products, these high priced keyboards appeal to a part of the buyer's mind that operates without acknowledging logic or reason and they generally WANT the "junior high playing in the computer lab" sensation that you might find absurd.

    I am amused that they're finally coming around to trying to make these mechanical keyboards as quiet at their discount, mass-produced competitors. It's even more comical that the reduction in typing noise is a highly stressed selling point, but it _is_ a principal of product differentiation that people with marketing degrees enjoy having at their disposal in their adverts. However, I'd be willing to bet that nearly any inexpensive rubber dome keyboard is a lot quieter.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now